Sony FE Images Thread
p.602 #1Sony FE Images Thread
Clearwater a7r wrote:
A7S
Schact Edixa-Mat-Travenar 90mm f/2.8
http://savel.smugmug.com/Photography/Lens-Specific-Galleries/Schacht-Edixa-Mat-Travenar/i-B2LzjD2/1/X2/DSC00970-X2.jpg
Nice. I have that lens in a rare variation of the exakta mount and have never been able to use it.
A7S
Schact Edixa-Mat-Travenar 90mm f/2.8
http://savel.smugmug.com/Photography/Lens-Specific-Galleries/Schacht-Edixa-Mat-Travenar/i-B2LzjD2/1/X2/DSC00970-X2.jpg
Nice. I have that lens in a rare variation of the exakta mount and have never been able to use it.
Dec 11, 2014 at 07:29 AM
p.602 #2Sony FE Images Thread
i'm sorry you haven't been able to use it
i really have enjoyed this lens
i still lust after the Leica Apo-Summicron-M 1:2/90 Aspherical... so i found this nice Schact to "satisfy" me for now
The A7 series has brought me so much joy in being able to use legacy glass
i truly hope you will find a way to adapt your EXAKTA mount, if possible
the very best to you, always
one more
not that interesting
wish i had been able to shoot from above a bit more
cigar creation
i really have enjoyed this lens
i still lust after the Leica Apo-Summicron-M 1:2/90 Aspherical... so i found this nice Schact to "satisfy" me for now
The A7 series has brought me so much joy in being able to use legacy glass
i truly hope you will find a way to adapt your EXAKTA mount, if possible
the very best to you, always
one more
not that interesting
wish i had been able to shoot from above a bit more
cigar creation
Dec 11, 2014 at 07:39 AM
p.602 #3Sony FE Images Thread
Peire wrote:
I didn't know that a quick reply would not refer to the post I was replying to!
Very cool bridge design and nice capture.
I was actually replying to Peire regarding the canon lenses, however I do so enjoy your pix too
and thanks for the adaptor info.
SusanSorry Susan.B.I didn't think your question was directed to me.
I use mostly cheap chinese/HK manual adapters,branded ones, (for example Pixco),and noname,regarding them very often as good as more expensive makes like Kipon.I have the Metabones Mk3 for my Z series Zeisses with Canon EF mounts too,but it's horrendous price with duty is deterring.
Thanks Peire,
Yes, your lens mounts are working well!
Keep posting 'em and thanks for the info re the lens mounts.
Susan
Susan.B wrote
Thanks Michiel,I didn't know that a quick reply would not refer to the post I was replying to!
Very cool bridge design and nice capture.
I was actually replying to Peire regarding the canon lenses, however I do so enjoy your pix too
and thanks for the adaptor info. Susan
I use mostly cheap chinese/HK manual adapters,branded ones, (for example Pixco),and noname,regarding them very often as good as more expensive makes like Kipon.I have the Metabones Mk3 for my Z series Zeisses with Canon EF mounts too,but it's horrendous price with duty is deterring.
Thanks Peire,
Yes, your lens mounts are working well!
Keep posting 'em and thanks for the info re the lens mounts.
Susan
Dec 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM
p.602 #4Sony FE Images Thread
fleeing to the local conservatory for some florals...zeiss 50
and one thing the local rain has been good for....zeiss 18/4
and one thing the local rain has been good for....zeiss 18/4
Dec 11, 2014 at 12:07 PM
p.602 #5Sony FE Images Thread
Mike, you indicate your shot (very nice, BTW) has been shot with Zeiss 18/4. Is that the ZM? How can you get it to work for you at infinity on a A7?
Dec 11, 2014 at 03:41 PM
p.602 #6Sony FE Images Thread
philber wrote:
Mike, you indicate your shot (very nice, BTW) has been shot with Zeiss 18/4. Is that the ZM? How can you get it to work for you at infinity on a A7?
+1! I was wondering the exact same thing. I tried that lens and hated it on the A7R...
Mike, you indicate your shot (very nice, BTW) has been shot with Zeiss 18/4. Is that the ZM? How can you get it to work for you at infinity on a A7?
+1! I was wondering the exact same thing. I tried that lens and hated it on the A7R...
Dec 11, 2014 at 03:48 PM
p.602 #8Sony FE Images Thread
Hey theres that yellow ping pong table
Yes its shot with the CY Zeiss 18/4 and dumb adapter
Yes its shot with the CY Zeiss 18/4 and dumb adapter
Dec 11, 2014 at 04:17 PM
p.602 #9Sony FE Images Thread
Haha, you guys should have an FM Seattle meet and thread!
Dec 11, 2014 at 05:01 PM
p.602 #10Sony FE Images Thread
A7 + Minolta Rokkor 58mm F1.4, Was experimenting with DxO for this shot.
DSC05728_DxO by Falcdragon, on Flickr
While this one is the more usual Lightroom + PhotoNinja pp.
Evening Light by Falcdragon, on Flickr
Sony 20mm F2.8 (A-mount), a recent acquisition.
DSC05673 by Falcdragon, on Flickr
DSC05728_DxO by Falcdragon, on Flickr
While this one is the more usual Lightroom + PhotoNinja pp.
Evening Light by Falcdragon, on Flickr
Sony 20mm F2.8 (A-mount), a recent acquisition.
DSC05673 by Falcdragon, on Flickr
Dec 11, 2014 at 06:46 PM
|
p.602 #12Sony FE Images Thread
Dramatic clouds tonight from atop the Columbia Center. Zeiss 21mm
Dec 11, 2014 at 08:20 PM
p.602 #13Sony FE Images Thread
sculptormic wrote:
Phillipe, I hope your face faded back in your normal color scheme But thanks a lot my friend, but please don't hate us 
And Werner; thank you
This one is a bit to green (got a bit lost in the emoticons)
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7489/15809839618_d8d1c94dc9_o.jpg
The Contax 70-200 3.5-4.5! Can you tell me a little about your setup (adapter/af/mf etc) and the performance of the lens? I have used the Canon 70-200 f4, Nikon 70-200 f4, Minolta 80-200 2.8 if that helps. I was attracted because of the Zeiss-factor, and size. But I am pretty picky about IQ, and I haven't been able to find as much info as I'd like. Is it better than the 80-200 Contax Zeiss?
philber wrote
I am glad that you can't see me, because I am green with envy. So many great shots from you, Helena (interesting, never thought of Pisa as being in Norway), Peire, Werner, Manuel! But the ones that really blew me away (this time, because many of you are strong enough to do this to me!) are from Michiel. At least 2 of your pics dropped my jaw, and I would love to frame them and hang them up. I hate you all. But thanks a lot my friend, but please don't hate us And Werner; thank you
This one is a bit to green
(got a bit lost in the emoticons)The Contax 70-200 3.5-4.5! Can you tell me a little about your setup (adapter/af/mf etc) and the performance of the lens? I have used the Canon 70-200 f4, Nikon 70-200 f4, Minolta 80-200 2.8 if that helps. I was attracted because of the Zeiss-factor, and size. But I am pretty picky about IQ, and I haven't been able to find as much info as I'd like. Is it better than the 80-200 Contax Zeiss?
Dec 12, 2014 at 12:00 AM
p.602 #14Sony FE Images Thread
aeonsim wrote:
A7 + Minolta Rokkor 58mm F1.4, Was experimenting with DxO for this shot.
Gorgeous scene. I think I would like a combination of the two post processes since the big mansion building seems better with the normal processing and the buildings in the foreground and trees in the middle of the image look really cool with the dxo processing. Sometimes boosting the dark end helps define things really nicely and sometimes it is a bit heavy. Awesome capture to work with.
Susan
A7 + Minolta Rokkor 58mm F1.4, Was experimenting with DxO for this shot.
Gorgeous scene. I think I would like a combination of the two post processes since the big mansion building seems better with the normal processing and the buildings in the foreground and trees in the middle of the image look really cool with the dxo processing. Sometimes boosting the dark end helps define things really nicely and sometimes it is a bit heavy. Awesome capture to work with.
Susan
Dec 12, 2014 at 12:31 AM
p.602 #15Sony FE Images Thread
mike reid wrote:
Hey theres that yellow ping pong table
Yes its shot with the CY Zeiss 18/4 and dumb adapter
Thanks, Mike!
Hey theres that yellow ping pong table
Yes its shot with the CY Zeiss 18/4 and dumb adapter
Thanks, Mike!
Dec 12, 2014 at 12:51 AM
p.602 #16Sony FE Images Thread
nehemiahphoto wrote:
Phillipe, I hope your face faded back in your normal color scheme But thanks a lot my friend, but please don't hate us
And Werner; thank you
This one is a bit to green (got a bit lost in the emoticons)
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7489/15809839618_d8d1c94dc9_o.jpg The Contax 70-200 3.5-4.5! Can you tell me a little about your setup (adapter/af/mf etc) and the performance of the lens? I have used the Canon 70-200 f4, Nikon 70-200 f4, Minolta 80-200 2.8 if that helps. I was attracted because of the Zeiss-factor, and size. But I am pretty picky about IQ, and I haven't been able to find as much info as I'd like. Is it better than the 80-200 Contax Zeiss?
If you go back a few pages you would see I have been saying a few times that I use the Kipon adapter. It has electrical contacts for camera info and in camera diafragm handling if you put the diafragm on wide 3.5 open on the lens.
I have the c/y zeiss 70-200 as well. I prefer the Contax N. A bit more pop and nice sharp. A bit shorter as well.
If you want Autofocus look for the Fringer adapter. A lot more expensive.
This is wide open, I think.
sculptormic wrote
philber wrote
I am glad that you can't see me, because I am green with envy. So many great shots from you, Helena (interesting, never thought of Pisa as being in Norway), Peire, Werner, Manuel! But the ones that really blew me away (this time, because many of you are strong enough to do this to me!) are from Michiel. At least 2 of your pics dropped my jaw, and I would love to frame them and hang them up. I hate you all. But thanks a lot my friend, but please don't hate us And Werner; thank you
This one is a bit to green
(got a bit lost in the emoticons)If you go back a few pages you would see I have been saying a few times that I use the Kipon adapter. It has electrical contacts for camera info and in camera diafragm handling if you put the diafragm on wide 3.5 open on the lens.
I have the c/y zeiss 70-200 as well. I prefer the Contax N. A bit more pop and nice sharp. A bit shorter as well.
If you want Autofocus look for the Fringer adapter. A lot more expensive.
This is wide open, I think.
 |
||
 |
||
|
Dec 12, 2014 at 03:04 AM
p.602 #17Sony FE Images Thread
Susan.B wrote:
Gorgeous scene. I think I would like a combination of the two post processes since the big mansion building seems better with the normal processing and the buildings in the foreground and trees in the middle of the image look really cool with the dxo processing. Sometimes boosting the dark end helps define things really nicely and sometimes it is a bit heavy. Awesome capture to work with.
Susan
A good idea I'll have to have a go at that, the two images are from different shots over a couple of minutes with fairly fast moving cloud so the lighting was changing from frame to frame. But it'd certainly be interesting too take the second shot and add some processing in DxO to see if the trees can be resolved better.
Thanks!
aeonsim wrote
A7 + Minolta Rokkor 58mm F1.4, Was experimenting with DxO for this shot.Susan
A good idea I'll have to have a go at that, the two images are from different shots over a couple of minutes with fairly fast moving cloud so the lighting was changing from frame to frame. But it'd certainly be interesting too take the second shot and add some processing in DxO to see if the trees can be resolved better.
Thanks!
Dec 12, 2014 at 03:37 AM
p.602 #18Sony FE Images Thread
Schloss Lerbach, Bergisch Gladbach
DSC01200.jpg by W.Utsch, on Flickr
Dec 12, 2014 at 06:38 AM
p.602 #19Sony FE Images Thread
With the A7+CV12
DSC04530-2400 by
jenkwang, on Flickr
20141102-DSC04539-2400 by jenkwang, on Flickr
DSC04530-2400 by
jenkwang, on Flickr
20141102-DSC04539-2400 by jenkwang, on Flickr
Dec 12, 2014 at 07:43 AM
p.602 #20Sony FE Images Thread
A few more pictures from the frosty meadow.All with A7.
Canon FDn 135/2.0
Canon FDn 50/1.2L
Canon FDn 24/2.0
Canon FDn 100/4 macro
Canon FDn 135/2.0
Canon FDn 50/1.2L
Canon FDn 24/2.0
Canon FDn 100/4 macro
Dec 12, 2014 at 07:52 AM