fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              52              54              5214       5215       end
  

Sony FE Images Thread

  
 
sculptormic
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #1 · Sony FE Images Thread


Lots of rain here, so I am working on some recent files.








Dec 21, 2013 at 03:20 PM
kroyston
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #2 · Sony FE Images Thread


ebrandon wrote:
I think you'll be pleased with the OM 135mm 2.8 -- here's a shot at f4 or f5.6 from last night in very low magenta light taken about 10 minutes after sunset.

There's no shortage of 135's to try on the A7(r) -- it's probably the second most common focal length after 50mm in my lens collection. And they're almost all terrific -- it's an easy focal length to design. I suspect that after I've tried them all my favorites will end up being the EF 135mm f2L for it's overall excellence, the Sony STF 135mm for it's unique look and
...Show more

Thanks for the insight! I loved the 135L on my 5dIII, that along with the TS-E 24 are the two I wish I still had for the a7. I almost had another in a trade a few days ago, but that fell through. I'm hoping the OM will tide me over until we find out more about the road map... and it is 1/4 the cost of a Metabones adapter!



Dec 21, 2013 at 03:21 PM
Samuli Vahonen
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #3 · Sony FE Images Thread


ebrandon wrote:
But there's no doubt the OM is nice on the A7R -- small, light, well balanced, smooth to operate, nice built in hood etc.

Have to try that one as well. Seems I don't yet have OM -> E-mount adapter, need to order few. EDIT: Checked mine and it's actually not the same but f/3.5 version. I almost didn't find it since I was looking something Contax 135mm f/2.8 size lens, but this one is half the size...



Today I was again enjoying short flange distance benefits, this time with Minolta MC Rokkor-PG 1:1.2 f=58mm. I have wanted this lens ~5 years, but never bothered to convert one to EF-mount. Light was really crappy, most of the time about f/1.2, 1/100s, ISO 250 - few times clouds let little more light past them and was able to shoot few frames with ISO 100. Luckily A7 seems to produce usable results even at ISO 400. For web even ISO 6400 does very well, but for normal print size & screen evaluation ISO 800 starts to be too noise for my taste.

BTW. Is it normal for Rokkor 58/1.2 to show slight glow when shoot wide open? It can be seen at least on #01 and #03. And on #04 the part of image, which is between focus point and camera is lighter/brighter than it would be if it would be in focus.



Notice: Vignetting has been decreased by settings in Iridient Developer (otherwise default slide positions on vignetting correction but moved first slider from 0 to 25)..

#01. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/100s, ISO 100


#02. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/320s, ISO 200


#03. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/320s, ISO 200


#04. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/100s, ISO 200 - foreground bokeh rendering is quite nice, somehow the parts in front of focus plane ger lighter/brighter than they would be in focus


#05. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/80s, ISO 200


#06. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/100s, ISO 250


#07. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/100s, ISO 250 - have to be careful, bokeh can get really ugly as well, example:


#08. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/100s, ISO 400


#09. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/80s, ISO 400


#10. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/60s, ISO 500


#11. Rokkor 58/1.2@f/1.2, 1/60s, ISO 640



Most testphotos were same locations as Canon FD 85mm f/1.2 L test photos exactly week ago, they can be found from here.

Samuli



Dec 21, 2013 at 03:26 PM
Jabberwockt
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #4 · Sony FE Images Thread


^Congrats on getting the Rokkor, The copies i've tried all do have a slight glow wide open, but your photos show more glow than i remember it to make, i could be mistaken though. The bokeh becomes really lovely stopped down to f2-2.8 IMO

Here's a ZM50 shot, for some reason I still think i like the G45 better. Can't quite figure out why though.



Dec 21, 2013 at 04:10 PM
Taylor Sherman
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.53 #5 · Sony FE Images Thread


Dang, #04 looks like large format Samuli!




Dec 21, 2013 at 04:25 PM
wfrank
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #6 · Sony FE Images Thread


Samuli Vahonen wrote:
BTW. Is it normal for Rokkor 58/1.2 to show slight glow when shoot wide open? It can be seen at least on #01 and #03. And on #04 the part of image, which is between focus point and camera is lighter/brighter than it would be if it would be in ...
Samuli


From my Rokkor 58/1.2 (ancient, yellowish, metallic) I dont expect perfect flat field at 1.2. Depending on light I'd expect some glow just as from e.g CY50/1.4.



Dec 21, 2013 at 04:28 PM
Samuli Vahonen
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #7 · Sony FE Images Thread


Jabberwockt wrote:
^Congrats on getting the Rokkor, The copies i've tried all do have a slight glow wide open, but your photos show more glow than i remember it to make, i could be mistaken though.

Thanks. I think this version is with the oldest coatings. Not sure the information about 58/1.2 versions wasn't clearest possible in the internet.

Jabberwockt wrote:
The bokeh becomes really lovely stopped down to f2-2.8 IMO

Damn, I assumed this is "wide open"-lens and shoot almost all tests wide open. Well, there wouldn't have been enough light for f/2.8 shooting anyways. I shoot few with f/2.8 and contrast raised a lot but had to raise ISO too high.

Jabberwockt wrote:
Here's a ZM50 shot, for some reason I still think i like the G45 better. Can't quite figure out why though.

I want both, but don't know yet which of the ZM-version. G45 is so cheap that I think I just have to get one, also I "must" get it because went to post office few days ago to receive package and at home I found Contax G adapter from the package even I don't remember ordering one

PS. Once posted photo like yours and got feedback that "you can't post photo which isn't sharp in center"



Taylor Sherman wrote:
Dang, #04 looks like large format Samuli!

Thanks, thou I think Canon FD 85mm f/1.2 L did it even better, but had advantage of much better light as well (FD85L image I posted earlier on page 37 and #7)



wfrank wrote:
From my Rokkor 58/1.2 (ancient, yellowish, metallic) I dont expect perfect flat field at 1.2. Depending on light I'd expect some glow just as from e.g CY50/1.4.

Thanks for info - I was actually surprised of field's flatness (positive surprise). Flat field is not very important for me, as I usually shoot real organic 3D objects and rarely man made flat stuff.

Samuli



Dec 21, 2013 at 04:54 PM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #8 · Sony FE Images Thread


Samuli Vahonen wrote:
BTW. Is it normal for Rokkor 58/1.2 to show slight glow when shoot wide open? It can be seen at least on #01 and #03. And on #04 the part of image, which is between focus point and camera is lighter/brighter than it would be if it would be in focus.

Samuli


really like the last shot.

the rokkor has a rather large amount of SA causing noticeable glow at wide apertures, it is particularly noticeable if you have bright highlights near the focus plane and a subject that is partially in front of of the focus plane (i mean closer to the camera than the focus plane). you images look a little glowier than i'd expect, but it's probably just due to the compositions. the rokkor does have a flatter field (even at f/1.2) and more even level of sharpness than any other fast 50 i've shot with. the trade off with this is that it is not as sharp and contrasty in the center as many other fast 50s.

samuli – for your shooting style i suspect f/2 will be the optimal aperture on the rokkor. contrast jumps up substantially at f/2 and the bokeh smooths out a lot as well while still retaining a bit of character and a bit of SA.




Dec 21, 2013 at 07:13 PM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #9 · Sony FE Images Thread


Jabberwockt wrote:
Here's a ZM50 shot, for some reason I still think i like the G45 better. Can't quite figure out why though.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7295/11485023643_80d53c3e93_o.jpg


zeiss's mtfs indicate that the g45 is slightly sharper over most of the frame. it always seems a little harsher to me in rendering as well. shame about the hexagonal aperture blades.




Dec 21, 2013 at 07:16 PM
zhangyue
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.53 #10 · Sony FE Images Thread


sebboh wrote:
really like the last shot.

the rokkor has a rather large amount of SA causing noticeable glow at wide apertures, it is particularly noticeable if you have bright highlights near the focus plane and a subject that is partially in front of of the focus plane (i mean closer to the camera than the focus plane). you images look a little glowier than i'd expect, but it's probably just due to the compositions. the rokkor does have a flatter field (even at f/1.2) and more even level of sharpness than any other fast 50 i've shot with. the trade off with
...Show more
+1 about Rokkor's cross frame performance. In my recent test include 50lux M, R, 50cron M and R, 50 nikkor 1.2, 1.8G(only tested f16 for this one, no smart adaptor) and 58mm rokkor.
Rokkor is #1 at f2 and #1 or tie at f2.8. after that, it is getting close to each other. Granted, M lens struggled at A7R.

A image with Nikkor 1.2 AIS at f5.6 with A7R. it is belong no where but here








Dec 21, 2013 at 07:30 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

theophilus
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #11 · Sony FE Images Thread


A7 + FE55/1.8 @ f/3.2








Dec 21, 2013 at 07:38 PM
Steve Spencer
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.53 #12 · Sony FE Images Thread


sebboh wrote:
really like the last shot.

the rokkor has a rather large amount of SA causing noticeable glow at wide apertures, it is particularly noticeable if you have bright highlights near the focus plane and a subject that is partially in front of of the focus plane (i mean closer to the camera than the focus plane). you images look a little glowier than i'd expect, but it's probably just due to the compositions. the rokkor does have a flatter field (even at f/1.2) and more even level of sharpness than any other fast 50 i've shot with. the trade off with
...Show more

+1 My experience totally maps onto Derek's here. I am not afraid to shoot my Rokkor wide open, but I shoot it at f/2 a lot more often. I think it is often the optimum aperture.



Dec 21, 2013 at 08:06 PM
jojomon11
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #13 · Sony FE Images Thread


First day w/55 FE 1.8, def. worth the purchase for those days when to lazy to MF












Dec 21, 2013 at 08:16 PM
michael49
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #14 · Sony FE Images Thread


A few recent ones with the A7....

Sigma 15 fish....




Zuiko 21 3.5 (really enjoying this lens on the A7)....(I also own the 28mm 3.5 and I tested it today vs the C/Y 28 2.8 and the Zuiko was surprisingly close).....





This is wide open with the Zuiko 21mm....






21mm again....






and again....



Dec 21, 2013 at 08:56 PM
steve g
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #15 · Sony FE Images Thread


Makro-Planar ZE 2/50







Dec 21, 2013 at 09:20 PM
philip_pj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.53 #16 · Sony FE Images Thread


Some from the CY 21mm





ISO 12800







ISO 5000, wall 'artifacts' are actual wall




Dec 21, 2013 at 10:51 PM
philip_pj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.53 #17 · Sony FE Images Thread


Two of my personal wall test chart. Having an a7r I almost feel obliged to post shutter speeds so will do. The 100% view is very detailed.





Summicron-R 50/2 ISO 1000 s/s: 1/100s







CY 100mm f3.5, ISO 8000 s/s: 1/250s




Dec 21, 2013 at 10:57 PM
sxgva
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #18 · Sony FE Images Thread


Wow is that a Tibetan Tangkah? Beautiful!


Dec 21, 2013 at 11:39 PM
SteveF
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.53 #19 · Sony FE Images Thread


A snowy owl with the a7r, Metabones vIII, 500/4 is and 2xv3 converter. I have some good flight shots, but not manually focused with the Sony.









Dec 21, 2013 at 11:51 PM
Noodlz79
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.53 #20 · Sony FE Images Thread


The CY21 and CY100f3.4 looks nice and punchy Phillip!

Great shots again everyone!

The OM 24mm f/2.8 has been working out quite nicely at f11 considering it's bargain price. The CY100P is becoming my favourite walkabout lens with it's sweet rendering.


Inception by Sean H Choe, on Flickr


Beware of Sharks by Sean H Choe, on Flickr


Framed by the Mirror by Sean H Choe, on Flickr


Ho Ho Ho by Sean H Choe, on Flickr


R <3 J by Sean H Choe, on Flickr



Dec 22, 2013 at 12:26 AM
1       2       3              52              54              5214       5215       end






FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              52              54              5214       5215       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account