Sony FE Images Thread
p.419 #1Sony FE Images Thread
AGeoJO wrote:
A few portrait images using a Sony ZA 135mm f/1.8 at close to wide open. I thought I set the aperture at f/1.8 but I must have nudged the scroll wheel without me realizing it. That happens quite a bit actually
.
Personally, I think the lens looks best at f/2. It seems to tame some of the wilder elements in the deep bokeh.
A few portrait images using a Sony ZA 135mm f/1.8 at close to wide open. I thought I set the aperture at f/1.8 but I must have nudged the scroll wheel without me realizing it. That happens quite a bit actually
.Personally, I think the lens looks best at f/2. It seems to tame some of the wilder elements in the deep bokeh.
Jul 30, 2014 at 12:35 PM
p.419 #2Sony FE Images Thread
Greggf wrote:
Beautiful portraits AGeoJO....
Couple more with the Contax 35-70...
Gregg
Hrm, I really like how that lens draws, and seems to give the Minolta a definite challenge.
---
Two from Minolta 35-70/3.5 and 28mm ext tube.
Bumble MD3570 by J L Smith, on Flickr
Whiteout worm MD3570 by J L Smith, on Flickr
Beautiful portraits AGeoJO....
Couple more with the Contax 35-70...
Gregg
Hrm, I really like how that lens draws, and seems to give the Minolta a definite challenge.
---
Two from Minolta 35-70/3.5 and 28mm ext tube.
Bumble MD3570 by J L Smith, on FlickrWhiteout worm MD3570 by J L Smith, on FlickrJul 30, 2014 at 12:38 PM
p.419 #3Sony FE Images Thread
A7+Distagon 28/2.8 C/Y + Contax 7.5mm extension Ring
A7+Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.7
A7+Pentacon Electric 100/2.8 m42
A7+Nikkor AIS ED 180/2.8
A7+Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.7
A7+Pentacon Electric 100/2.8 m42
A7+Nikkor AIS ED 180/2.8
Jul 30, 2014 at 01:00 PM
p.419 #4Sony FE Images Thread
Yellowstone National Park, 28mm Sigma Mini-wide, F11, ISO 100, Sony A7R
Sigma Miniwide_dsc4994-2-01-'2014-07-23' by jgaster, on Flickr
Sigma Miniwide_dsc4994-2-01-'2014-07-23' by jgaster, on FlickrJul 30, 2014 at 01:05 PM
p.419 #6Sony FE Images Thread
Went for a 2 day trip to Pittsburgh. Took this late last night (technically earlier today). A7 + fe 55 1.8.
Downtown Pittsburgh by phuviano, on Flickr
Downtown Pittsburgh by phuviano, on FlickrJul 30, 2014 at 01:55 PM
p.419 #8Sony FE Images Thread
Glacial stream coming off Mt. Baker in Washington's Cascade Mountains. A7r - Canon EF 16-35mm F/4
Jul 30, 2014 at 04:48 PM
p.419 #9Sony FE Images Thread
trying to decide whether keep the EF 70-300mm DO. it seems reasonably sharp with interesting bokeh at 300mm, but has quite the peculiar glow wide open in bright light.
here's a 50% crop:
also, one of my subjects decided to inspect some of my lenses when i was testing it out:
here's a 50% crop:
also, one of my subjects decided to inspect some of my lenses when i was testing it out:
Jul 30, 2014 at 04:57 PM
|
p.419 #14Sony FE Images Thread
AGeoJO wrote:
A few portrait images using a Sony ZA 135mm f/1.8 at close to wide open. I thought I set the aperture at f/1.8 but I must have nudged the scroll wheel without me realizing it. That happens quite a bit actually.
Lovely shots of a stunning model - I really like #1 & #3. Personally I'd be using the Samyang 14mm so I could stand as close to her as possible
A few portrait images using a Sony ZA 135mm f/1.8 at close to wide open. I thought I set the aperture at f/1.8 but I must have nudged the scroll wheel without me realizing it. That happens quite a bit actually
.Lovely shots of a stunning model - I really like #1 & #3. Personally I'd be using the Samyang 14mm so I could stand as close to her as possible
Jul 30, 2014 at 09:35 PM
p.419 #15Sony FE Images Thread
jgaster wrote:
Yellowstone National Park, 28mm Sigma Mini-wide, F11, ISO 100, Sony A7R
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3847/14764008904_d0331d30a0_h.jpgSigma Miniwide_dsc4994-2-01-'2014-07-23' by jgaster, on Flickr
Really like these shots. However they don't look as sharp as they might be and I'm wondering if you haven't hit the point of diffraction (or maybe just a software issue) ? On the D800E I use it's already noticeable at f11 and sometimes f8 with particular lenses. Anybody know if this is the same with the A7(r) ?
Yellowstone National Park, 28mm Sigma Mini-wide, F11, ISO 100, Sony A7R
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3847/14764008904_d0331d30a0_h.jpgSigma Miniwide_dsc4994-2-01-'2014-07-23' by jgaster, on Flickr
Really like these shots. However they don't look as sharp as they might be and I'm wondering if you haven't hit the point of diffraction (or maybe just a software issue) ? On the D800E I use it's already noticeable at f11 and sometimes f8 with particular lenses. Anybody know if this is the same with the A7(r) ?
Jul 30, 2014 at 09:41 PM
p.419 #16Sony FE Images Thread
sebboh wrote:
also, one of my subjects decided to inspect some of my lenses when i was testing it out:
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5569/14775855111_117335fbe0_o.jpg
Ha ha - wonderful. Seems to have some seed in it's bill, part of the attraction ?
also, one of my subjects decided to inspect some of my lenses when i was testing it out:
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5569/14775855111_117335fbe0_o.jpg
Ha ha - wonderful. Seems to have some seed in it's bill, part of the attraction ?
Jul 30, 2014 at 09:44 PM
p.419 #17Sony FE Images Thread
cputeq wrote:
Couple more with the Contax 35-70...
GreggHrm, I really like how that lens draws, and seems to give the Minolta a definite challenge.
---
Two from Minolta 35-70/3.5 and 28mm ext tube.
https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2933/14785916584_4992bb4b10_o.jpgBumble MD3570 by J L Smith, on Flickr
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3906/14785126841_29668bd7b8_o.jpgWhiteout worm MD3570 by J L Smith, on Flickr
Hrm, I really like how that lens draws, and seems to give the Minolta a definite challenge.
That it does. I've had the Contax 2-3 times now, and it never ceases to amaze me. I ended up getting the MD 35-70 cause it was a steal, AND it has great colors, too. I had the Leica R Vario Elmar 35-70/4 Macro briefly, and while an excellent lens, I preferred the Contax, and so traded the R for a R Cron 50.
I'll have to get some tubes to use with the Contax, or even the MD. Which did you use for the MD 35-70? My only gripe with the MD, is that it only goes to 1:4 in macro, whereas the Contax someone told me, does 1:2.5.
Gregg
Greggf wrote
Beautiful portraits AGeoJO....Couple more with the Contax 35-70...
Gregg
---
Two from Minolta 35-70/3.5 and 28mm ext tube.
https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2933/14785916584_4992bb4b10_o.jpgBumble MD3570 by J L Smith, on Flickr
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3906/14785126841_29668bd7b8_o.jpgWhiteout worm MD3570 by J L Smith, on Flickr
Hrm, I really like how that lens draws, and seems to give the Minolta a definite challenge.
That it does. I've had the Contax 2-3 times now, and it never ceases to amaze me. I ended up getting the MD 35-70 cause it was a steal, AND it has great colors, too. I had the Leica R Vario Elmar 35-70/4 Macro briefly, and while an excellent lens, I preferred the Contax, and so traded the R for a R Cron 50.
I'll have to get some tubes to use with the Contax, or even the MD. Which did you use for the MD 35-70? My only gripe with the MD, is that it only goes to 1:4 in macro, whereas the Contax someone told me, does 1:2.5.
Gregg
Jul 30, 2014 at 09:48 PM
p.419 #18Sony FE Images Thread
Frogfish wrote:
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5569/14775855111_117335fbe0_o.jpgHa ha - wonderful. Seems to have some seed in it's bill, part of the attraction ?
not seed actually. i was trying to test the lens on humming birds and opened the window for clear shooting. my daughter had made a mess eating her granola though and a few juncos and chickadees wandered in to help clean up.
a couple shots with the m 35 lux pre-asph.
wide open:
f/2:
sebboh wrote
also, one of my subjects decided to inspect some of my lenses when i was testing it out:http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5569/14775855111_117335fbe0_o.jpg
not seed actually. i was trying to test the lens on humming birds and opened the window for clear shooting. my daughter had made a mess eating her granola though and a few juncos and chickadees wandered in to help clean up.
a couple shots with the m 35 lux pre-asph.
wide open:
f/2:
Jul 30, 2014 at 11:08 PM
p.419 #19Sony FE Images Thread
A7 with c sonnar 50/1.5
Edited on Aug 05, 2014 at 02:33 AM · View previous versions
Edited on Aug 05, 2014 at 02:33 AM · View previous versions
Jul 31, 2014 at 12:48 AM
p.419 #20Sony FE Images Thread
joanlvh wrote:
a7+minolta 35-70
I really was considering your second... model. The "S". Not fully convinced yet, though.
a7+minolta 35-70
I really was considering your second... model. The "S". Not fully convinced yet, though.
Jul 31, 2014 at 01:03 AM