Sony FE Images Thread
p.409 #1Sony FE Images Thread
These with my new love 
A7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
A7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
Jul 24, 2014 at 02:10 PM
p.409 #3Sony FE Images Thread
Got my extension tube set in today.
Fotodiox set of three, strange in that they use screw-in adapters but whatever, they were $12
Shot with A7 and Zeiss macro 100/2
Zeiss 100/2 naked (1:2)
Zeiss with the 28mm extension
Zeiss with all three stacked 28mm, 14mm, 7mm extensions
Sample shot ;) almost 1:1
Fotodiox set of three, strange in that they use screw-in adapters but whatever, they were $12
Shot with A7 and Zeiss macro 100/2
Zeiss 100/2 naked (1:2)
Zeiss with the 28mm extension
Zeiss with all three stacked 28mm, 14mm, 7mm extensions
 |
||
 |
||
|
Sample shot ;) almost 1:1
Jul 24, 2014 at 05:00 PM
p.409 #6Sony FE Images Thread
thefoxeur wrote:
newone what lens did you use ?
Oh sorry, Both the A7 with Zeiss 55mm 1.8 @ f2 1/250 160 ISO
newone what lens did you use ?
Oh sorry, Both the A7 with Zeiss 55mm 1.8 @ f2 1/250 160 ISO
Jul 24, 2014 at 07:47 PM
p.409 #7Sony FE Images Thread
One with newly aquired MC W.Rokkor-HG 35mm 2.8
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jul 24, 2014 at 07:48 PM
p.409 #8Sony FE Images Thread
A few from the A7R and 135/2 APO ZF.2, one of which was wide open. No fears shooting the Zeiss wide open as you hardly lose any IQ at infinity. It also doesn't mind being pointed directly into the sun as the flare and ghosting characteristics are very very good.
Jul 24, 2014 at 08:30 PM
p.409 #10Sony FE Images Thread
A7, Voitlander Nokton Classic 35, f1.4 Everything is completely manual.
Jul 24, 2014 at 10:04 PM
|
p.409 #11Sony FE Images Thread
newone757 wrote:
Oh sorry, Both the A7 with Zeiss 55mm 1.8 @ f2 1/250 160 ISO
Thanks you , very good job ! like your PP.
thefoxeur wrote
newone what lens did you use ?Thanks you , very good job ! like your PP.
Jul 24, 2014 at 10:19 PM
p.409 #12Sony FE Images Thread
ManuelLaMantia wrote:
These with my new love
A7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpg
Very nice pics again, Manuel - I see we have very similar tastes both in places to visit and lenses - this 35/2 is another one on my to-get list, although there don't seem to be a lot around. Clearly your A7R is handling low light very well, and the legacy lenses are a no-brainer. I'm just waiting for a loan of a demo camera to try before I commit, though pictures like these that you have put up are a very compelling reason to go ahead anyway!
These with my new love
A7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpg
Very nice pics again, Manuel - I see we have very similar tastes both in places to visit and lenses - this 35/2 is another one on my to-get list, although there don't seem to be a lot around. Clearly your A7R is handling low light very well, and the legacy lenses are a no-brainer. I'm just waiting for a loan of a demo camera to try before I commit, though pictures like these that you have put up are a very compelling reason to go ahead anyway!
Jul 24, 2014 at 10:44 PM
p.409 #13Sony FE Images Thread
Lots of really nice images here. I'm using all manual focus lenses with my A7r. I've been in lens testing mode for a couple weeks now I'm still using JPG mode
This one from JPG with the old Tamron 52B 90/2.5 macro, wide open at min focus (1:2). Although, I might have had an extension tube attached.
I'm still using JPG mode This one from JPG with the old Tamron 52B 90/2.5 macro, wide open at min focus (1:2). Although, I might have had an extension tube attached.Jul 24, 2014 at 11:46 PM
p.409 #14Sony FE Images Thread
navmannz wrote:
A7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpgVery nice pics again, Manuel - I see we have very similar tastes both in places to visit and lenses - this 35/2 is another one on my to-get list, although there don't seem to be a lot around. Clearly your A7R is handling low light very well, and the legacy lenses are a no-brainer. I'm just waiting for a loan of a demo camera to try before I commit, though pictures like these that you have put up are a very compelling reason to go ahead anyway!
Are you talking about the 35mm f2 with conclave optics or the non-conclave optics?
ManuelLaMantia wrote
These with my new loveA7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpg
Are you talking about the 35mm f2 with conclave optics or the non-conclave optics?
Jul 25, 2014 at 12:14 AM
p.409 #17Sony FE Images Thread
Mark Rigsby wrote:
A7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpgVery nice pics again, Manuel - I see we have very similar tastes both in places to visit and lenses - this 35/2 is another one on my to-get list, although there don't seem to be a lot around. Clearly your A7R is handling low light very well, and the legacy lenses are a no-brainer. I'm just waiting for a loan of a demo camera to try before I commit, though pictures like these that you have put up are a very compelling reason to go ahead anyway!Are you talking about the 35mm f2 with conclave optics or the non-conclave optics?
Yes, I see that there are lots of the older SSC version in 35 f2, but had been put off by the comments about the thorium discolouration and their proneness to flare, leaning more towards one of the nFD versions - are the earlier ones worth considering?
John
navmannz wrote
ManuelLaMantia wrote
These with my new loveA7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpg
Yes, I see that there are lots of the older SSC version in 35 f2, but had been put off by the comments about the thorium discolouration and their proneness to flare, leaning more towards one of the nFD versions - are the earlier ones worth considering?
John
Jul 25, 2014 at 03:44 AM
p.409 #19Sony FE Images Thread
navmannz wrote:
A7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpgVery nice pics again, Manuel - I see we have very similar tastes both in places to visit and lenses - this 35/2 is another one on my to-get list, although there don't seem to be a lot around. Clearly your A7R is handling low light very well, and the legacy lenses are a no-brainer. I'm just waiting for a loan of a demo camera to try before I commit, though pictures like these that you have put up are a very compelling reason to go ahead anyway!
Thanks John for the appreciation.
About A7R at low light, consider most of my pics are taken at 100 ISO with tripod so not a good test for high ISO however in my opinion is more than acceptable... maybe A7 is a little better and for sure A7S in better. After some months of normal use, I think A7 (24Mp) is the best compromise. I'm very satisfied with my A7R but I recognise the shutter vibration issue (with my Nikkor 300mm I've experienced directly) and the greater difficult to take perfect photos freehand (you have to hold the camera very steady due to the higher pixel density).
Here an example taken at 3200 ISO freehand with Canon FDn 35mm f/2
ManuelLaMantia wrote
These with my new loveA7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpg
Thanks John for the appreciation.
About A7R at low light, consider most of my pics are taken at 100 ISO with tripod so not a good test for high ISO
however in my opinion is more than acceptable... maybe A7 is a little better and for sure A7S in better. After some months of normal use, I think A7 (24Mp) is the best compromise. I'm very satisfied with my A7R but I recognise the shutter vibration issue (with my Nikkor 300mm I've experienced directly) and the greater difficult to take perfect photos freehand (you have to hold the camera very steady due to the higher pixel density).Here an example taken at 3200 ISO freehand
with Canon FDn 35mm f/2Jul 25, 2014 at 06:14 AM
p.409 #20Sony FE Images Thread
navmannz wrote:
A7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpgVery nice pics again, Manuel - I see we have very similar tastes both in places to visit and lenses - this 35/2 is another one on my to-get list, although there don't seem to be a lot around. Clearly your A7R is handling low light very well, and the legacy lenses are a no-brainer. I'm just waiting for a loan of a demo camera to try before I commit, though pictures like these that you have put up are a very compelling reason to go ahead anyway!Are you talking about the 35mm f2 with conclave optics or the non-conclave optics?Yes, I see that there are lots of the older SSC version in 35 f2, but had been put off by the comments about the thorium discolouration and their proneness to flare, leaning more towards one of the nFD versions - are the earlier ones worth considering?
John
John,
I chose the nFD (or FDn) version because is more cheap and because is not radioactive... the nFD have more plastic but lens quality is... shocking!!!
Have you already seen this review?
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4320
Is very interesting and after some use I can confirm every single word
Mark Rigsby wrote
navmannz wrote
ManuelLaMantia wrote
These with my new loveA7r + Canon FDn 35mm f/2
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_014_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/20140714_torrechiara_castello_016_1200x900.jpg
John
John,
I chose the nFD (or FDn) version because is more cheap and because is not radioactive... the nFD have more plastic but lens quality is... shocking!!!
Have you already seen this review?
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4320
Is very interesting and after some use I can confirm every single word
Jul 25, 2014 at 06:23 AM