Sony FE Images Thread
p.3020 #6Sony FE Images Thread
This image could have been cropped but somehow I like it to be more of an environmental portrait, showing more of the surrounding...
Spangle-cheeked tanager
 |
||
 |
||
 |
Spangle-cheeked tanager
Sep 29, 2018 at 06:00 AM
p.3020 #7Sony FE Images Thread
Thank you guys for all comments and opinions on my precedent post!
Browsing my old folders I found this interesting sky captured three years ago just behind home...
Manuel
Browsing my old folders I found this interesting sky captured three years ago just behind home...
Manuel
Sep 29, 2018 at 07:43 AM
p.3020 #8Sony FE Images Thread
AGeoJO wrote:
This image could have been cropped but somehow I like it to be more of an environmental portrait, showing more of the surrounding...
Hi Joshua,
You used both the Canon 1.4X and the Sony 1.4X Teleconverters for this image?
Rich
This image could have been cropped but somehow I like it to be more of an environmental portrait, showing more of the surrounding...
Hi Joshua,
You used both the Canon 1.4X and the Sony 1.4X Teleconverters for this image?
Rich
Sep 29, 2018 at 07:47 AM
p.3020 #9Sony FE Images Thread
naturephoto1 wrote:
Hi Joshua,
You used both the Canon 1.4X and the Sony 1.4X Teleconverters for this image?
Rich
That's correct, Rich - the Canon in the front and the Sony in the rear of the MB V; hence the "weird" FL data in the exif.
AGeoJO wrote
This image could have been cropped but somehow I like it to be more of an environmental portrait, showing more of the surrounding...You used both the Canon 1.4X and the Sony 1.4X Teleconverters for this image?
Rich
That's correct, Rich - the Canon in the front and the Sony in the rear of the MB V; hence the "weird" FL data in the exif.
Sep 29, 2018 at 07:51 AM
p.3020 #10Sony FE Images Thread
AGeoJO wrote:
Hi Joshua,
You used both the Canon 1.4X and the Sony 1.4X Teleconverters for this image?
RichThat's correct, Rich - the Canon in the front and the Sony in the rear of the MB V; hence the "weird" FL data in the exif.
H Joshua,
Thanks. I thought that was the case. The flexibility of this capability is certainly a reason to consider keeping the Canon 400mm f2.8 instead of opting for purchasing the new Sony 400mm f2.8 GM lens which will only offer the capabilities of using the lens alone, or with either the 1.4X or 2X Sony Teleconverters.
Rich
naturephoto1 wrote
AGeoJO wrote
This image could have been cropped but somehow I like it to be more of an environmental portrait, showing more of the surrounding...You used both the Canon 1.4X and the Sony 1.4X Teleconverters for this image?
Rich
H Joshua,
Thanks. I thought that was the case. The flexibility of this capability is certainly a reason to consider keeping the Canon 400mm f2.8 instead of opting for purchasing the new Sony 400mm f2.8 GM lens which will only offer the capabilities of using the lens alone, or with either the 1.4X or 2X Sony Teleconverters.
Rich
Sep 29, 2018 at 07:56 AM
|
p.3020 #11Sony FE Images Thread
A few from last week at the St. Joseph Lighthouse. All taken on the 7r2 and the 100-400 GM.
Ryan
Ryan
© lostinjapan 2016
© lostinjapan 2016
Sep 29, 2018 at 08:05 AM
p.3020 #12Sony FE Images Thread
naturephoto1 wrote:
Hi Joshua,
You used both the Canon 1.4X and the Sony 1.4X Teleconverters for this image?
RichThat's correct, Rich - the Canon in the front and the Sony in the rear of the MB V; hence the "weird" FL data in the exif.H Joshua,
Thanks. I thought that was the case. The flexibility of this capability is certainly a reason to consider keeping the Canon 400mm f2.8 instead of opting for purchasing the new Sony 400mm f2.8 GM lens which will only offer the capabilities of using the lens alone, or with either the 1.4X or 2X Sony Teleconverters.
Rich
Yes, you are correct, Rich. The optical performance of that Canon lens is superb and I would be happy if the Sony GM counterpart performs just like the Canon lens optically but and that's a BIG but, I am convinced that the AF performance of the native lens would just clobber that of the adapted lens. Do you need that? In my case, not all the time but there are cases where I really would like the AF performance of the Canon lens in combo with the MB V or Sigma MC-11 to be better. The way I look at it is right now is either Sony comes out with a A9r, a higher resolution A9, which enables more significant cropping or the A7000 or A6700, an APS-C body with the AF performance similar to that of the current A9. That being said, a lens with an effective FL of 800mm at f/5.6 lens is not something that we should sneer at
, of course.
AGeoJO wrote
naturephoto1 wrote
AGeoJO wrote
This image could have been cropped but somehow I like it to be more of an environmental portrait, showing more of the surrounding...You used both the Canon 1.4X and the Sony 1.4X Teleconverters for this image?
Rich
Thanks. I thought that was the case. The flexibility of this capability is certainly a reason to consider keeping the Canon 400mm f2.8 instead of opting for purchasing the new Sony 400mm f2.8 GM lens which will only offer the capabilities of using the lens alone, or with either the 1.4X or 2X Sony Teleconverters.
Rich
Yes, you are correct, Rich. The optical performance of that Canon lens is superb and I would be happy if the Sony GM counterpart performs just like the Canon lens optically but and that's a BIG but, I am convinced that the AF performance of the native lens would just clobber that of the adapted lens. Do you need that? In my case, not all the time but there are cases where I really would like the AF performance of the Canon lens in combo with the MB V or Sigma MC-11 to be better. The way I look at it is right now is either Sony comes out with a A9r, a higher resolution A9, which enables more significant cropping or the A7000 or A6700, an APS-C body with the AF performance similar to that of the current A9. That being said, a lens with an effective FL of 800mm at f/5.6 lens is not something that we should sneer at
, of course.Sep 29, 2018 at 08:23 AM
p.3020 #13Sony FE Images Thread
Uhgggg! More grocery shopping pictures -- on the weekend, no less! 
a7R2, 17/4 TSE, MC-11, hand held, LR
a7R2, 17/4 TSE, MC-11, hand held, LR
Sep 29, 2018 at 08:28 AM
p.3020 #14Sony FE Images Thread
-
Edited on Sep 29, 2018 at 10:55 AM · View previous versions
Edited on Sep 29, 2018 at 10:55 AM · View previous versions
Sep 29, 2018 at 10:38 AM
p.3020 #17Sony FE Images Thread
I finally managed to get a good copy of the 16-35mm GM
Botany Bay
Botany Bay
Sep 29, 2018 at 11:19 AM
p.3020 #18Sony FE Images Thread
Example of Buckhead District Atlanta architecture
Canon 24mm TSE
Canon 24mm TSE
|
||
 |
||
|
Sep 29, 2018 at 11:44 AM
p.3020 #20Sony FE Images Thread
Back from 2 weeks in Scotland and the Lake District yesterday with the 14mm SP Rokinon, 21mm Loxia, 24mm Canon TSE, 35mm Canon FD T/S lens, 65mm VC and 135mm Batis. Happy to say that they all got a good amount of use. NOT happy that my checked bag didn't make it to me until 6 days in the trip, so I was unsupported (no tripod) for a while. IBIS worked well enough to hand hold shots to slow water motion and we had mainly lousy weather for the 1st week so no astro options in any case.
Mallaig harbour
Glen Etive
A short clear spell that Harry must have magic'd for us
Loch Ailort
Tioram Castle
Balnakeil dunes and chapel
Rain on the hills
"Rain" in the falls (Glen Nevis)
Some clear skies in Edinburgh
St Giles
Patches of sun in the Lakes
Wasdale Head and St Olaf's chapel
Wast Water reflections
Mallaig harbour
Glen Etive
A short clear spell that Harry must have magic'd for us
Loch Ailort
Tioram Castle
Balnakeil dunes and chapel
Rain on the hills
"Rain" in the falls (Glen Nevis)
Some clear skies in Edinburgh
St Giles
Patches of sun in the Lakes
Wasdale Head and St Olaf's chapel
Wast Water reflections
Sep 29, 2018 at 02:04 PM