Sony FE Images Thread
p.2780 #1Sony FE Images Thread
Sony A7rII + Voigtlander 12 III VM
Carballeira de Francos by L, no Flickr
Carballeira de Francos by L, no Flickr
Apr 15, 2018 at 03:26 AM
p.2780 #2Sony FE Images Thread
Sony A7r II + Voigtlander 15 III VM
Miradoiro de Gundián by L, no Flickr
Miradoiro de Gundián by L, no Flickr
Apr 15, 2018 at 04:40 AM
p.2780 #3Sony FE Images Thread
I love this shot, toshiro. More spring stuff...
First two shots: 100-400 GM
[url=https://flic.kr/p/266JZWf]
_DGL1989 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]
[url=https://flic.kr/p/26axD7M]
_DGL1988 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]
Two shots with 90mm macro:
[url=https://flic.kr/p/26axCkM]
_DGL9376 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]
[url=https://flic.kr/p/23qGJ33]
_DGL9361 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]
First two shots: 100-400 GM
[url=https://flic.kr/p/266JZWf]
_DGL1989 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url][url=https://flic.kr/p/26axD7M]
_DGL1988 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]Two shots with 90mm macro:
[url=https://flic.kr/p/26axCkM]
_DGL9376 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url][url=https://flic.kr/p/23qGJ33]
_DGL9361 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]Apr 15, 2018 at 05:06 AM
p.2780 #4Sony FE Images Thread
Last night @Murtensee. This is a small lake in Switzerland.
The later blue hour was amazing for lights, but difficult even for the AF of the R3.
Worked with the tripod and the girl had to hold still for 1/3s (tripod).
Made with my most beloved Sony-Zeiss 50 1.4.
Man could criticize the composition. My idea was to compose with the two main leading lines going from the bottom corners to the middle where the light masses are.
So i couldn't take the girl more on the right side as the walk was to long to shoot from the side... Anyway. It was fun there...
R3, 1/3s, f1.4, ISO400
The later blue hour was amazing for lights, but difficult even for the AF of the R3.
Worked with the tripod and the girl had to hold still for 1/3s (tripod).
Made with my most beloved Sony-Zeiss 50 1.4.
Man could criticize the composition. My idea was to compose with the two main leading lines going from the bottom corners to the middle where the light masses are.
So i couldn't take the girl more on the right side as the walk was to long to shoot from the side... Anyway. It was fun there...
R3, 1/3s, f1.4, ISO400
Apr 15, 2018 at 05:15 AM
p.2780 #5Sony FE Images Thread
An other shot from last night.
This time made with the 100STF.
Same shutter "speed". A few minutes earlier than the shot above.
It's limits in the darkness are well and early definied. The AF beginns to get imprecise and doesn't bite certainly.
That's a bit sad for me as this light is one of the most beautiful for portraiture. But i knew it before purchasing this lens. So all is well - i still have my favourit - my 50 1.4.
So guys, i wish you all a nice sunday and all the best!
Chris
R3, 1/3s, f5,6, ISO400
This time made with the 100STF.
Same shutter "speed". A few minutes earlier than the shot above.
It's limits in the darkness are well and early definied. The AF beginns to get imprecise and doesn't bite certainly.
That's a bit sad for me as this light is one of the most beautiful for portraiture. But i knew it before purchasing this lens. So all is well - i still have my favourit - my 50 1.4.
So guys, i wish you all a nice sunday and all the best!
Chris
R3, 1/3s, f5,6, ISO400
Apr 15, 2018 at 05:22 AM
Apr 15, 2018 at 05:28 AM
p.2780 #7Sony FE Images Thread
Panoramas.
stitched with Lightroom
Camogli : A7 + FE 551.8
Monte Beigua : A7 + FE 35 2.8
A street : A7 + FE 55 1.8
Boccadasse : A7 + FE 55 1.8
Nervi : A7 + FE 28mm 2.0
stitched with Lightroom
Camogli : A7 + FE 551.8
Monte Beigua : A7 + FE 35 2.8
A street : A7 + FE 55 1.8
Boccadasse : A7 + FE 55 1.8
Nervi : A7 + FE 28mm 2.0
Apr 15, 2018 at 05:55 AM
p.2780 #8Sony FE Images Thread
These are beautiful portraits, but why stick to ISO 400 when you shutter speed is so low? The R3 has very good higher ISO, and I'd think you'd get sharper shots at something like ISO 1600 and 1/12s, especially because residual noise should clean up well with a mostly blurred background.
Desertcruiser wrote:
An other shot from last night.
This time made with the 100STF.
Same shutter "speed". A few minutes earlier than the shot above.
It's limits in the darkness are well and early definied. The AF beginns to get imprecise and doesn't bite certainly.
That's a bit sad for me as this light is one of the most beautiful for portraiture. But i knew it before purchasing this lens. So all is well - i still have my favourit - my 50 1.4.
So guys, i wish you all a nice sunday and all the best!
Chris
R3, 1/3s, f5,6, ISO400
http://up.picr.de/32401676fd.jpg
Desertcruiser wrote:
An other shot from last night.
This time made with the 100STF.
Same shutter "speed". A few minutes earlier than the shot above.
It's limits in the darkness are well and early definied. The AF beginns to get imprecise and doesn't bite certainly.
That's a bit sad for me as this light is one of the most beautiful for portraiture. But i knew it before purchasing this lens. So all is well - i still have my favourit - my 50 1.4.
So guys, i wish you all a nice sunday and all the best!
Chris
R3, 1/3s, f5,6, ISO400
http://up.picr.de/32401676fd.jpg
Apr 15, 2018 at 06:39 AM
p.2780 #9Sony FE Images Thread
Jman13 wrote:
These are beautiful portraits, but why stick to ISO 400 when you shutter speed is so low? The R3 has very good higher ISO, and I'd think you'd get sharper shots at something like ISO 1600 and 1/12s, especially because residual noise should clean up well with a mostly blurred background.
Hello Jordan
Thanks for your kind words and for taking time for my shots with assessement!
Technicaly you're absolutely right i think!
I'm new to sony and interested to see the limits. At ISO400 the dynamic should be quite ok, yes. Even with higher ISO.
As long as my girl can hold still, it worked more or less. If she is moving i have to chose ISO12'800 or higher - then we will see the difference.
For a still subject i prefer to take lower ISO. But for a test, why not?
An example with ISO100, 1/20, f5.6 (due STF).
All the best
Chris
These are beautiful portraits, but why stick to ISO 400 when you shutter speed is so low? The R3 has very good higher ISO, and I'd think you'd get sharper shots at something like ISO 1600 and 1/12s, especially because residual noise should clean up well with a mostly blurred background.
Hello Jordan
Thanks for your kind words and for taking time for my shots with assessement!
Technicaly you're absolutely right i think!
I'm new to sony and interested to see the limits. At ISO400 the dynamic should be quite ok, yes. Even with higher ISO.
As long as my girl can hold still, it worked more or less. If she is moving i have to chose ISO12'800 or higher - then we will see the difference.
For a still subject i prefer to take lower ISO. But for a test, why not?
An example with ISO100, 1/20, f5.6 (due STF).
All the best
Chris
Apr 15, 2018 at 06:50 AM
p.2780 #10Sony FE Images Thread
Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2/35 ZM @ f/4.0, 1/250s, A7(Kolari v2) @ ISO 125, OptoSigma SLB-50-3000PM + B+W 58 KSM C-POL MRC
Samuli
Apr 15, 2018 at 07:29 AM
|
p.2780 #12Sony FE Images Thread
he pops his head to see what im doing. then does a nice flyby and back to his bed.
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Apr 15, 2018 at 09:39 AM
p.2780 #13Sony FE Images Thread
^Nice! Critterracing. I hope we can see more and more wildlife shots in this thread. Did you get rid of your Nikon stuff? I still have my D500 and two long lenses...
Apr 15, 2018 at 09:52 AM
p.2780 #14Sony FE Images Thread
Similar time, similar sun, similar angle of viewing.
Loxia 35, perspective and PP correction in LR Classic CC.
Loxia 35, perspective and PP correction in LR Classic CC.
Apr 15, 2018 at 10:00 AM
p.2780 #15Sony FE Images Thread
Jim - Love all that green color. Not so green here in Minnesota where we had about 14" of snow. Last year at this time, we were boating!
Apr 15, 2018 at 10:18 AM
p.2780 #17Sony FE Images Thread
Bob that snow is ridiculous! But oh so beautiful 
Apr 15, 2018 at 10:53 AM
p.2780 #18Sony FE Images Thread
Our dog pouting that she can't go outside because of the snow.
Apr 15, 2018 at 10:53 AM
p.2780 #19Sony FE Images Thread
First time using the Rokinon 24mm F1.4 and first time using the Ioptron Sky Tracker Pro with that lens. Sadly with the tree cover up at the cabin I could not find Polaris so my polar alignment was rudimentary best guess.
Still my first time ever shooting Milky Way at ISO 1600, my norm is ISO 5000-8000 in my area, and first time with an exposure just over one minute. I think with the Skytracker if I could find Polaris I could reach a 2 min. exposure before too much star movement is apparent.
Another thing working against me was the Sun was already making itself known
Last Milky Way for a while I promise by MedicineMan4040, on Flickr
Still my first time ever shooting Milky Way at ISO 1600, my norm is ISO 5000-8000 in my area, and first time with an exposure just over one minute. I think with the Skytracker if I could find Polaris I could reach a 2 min. exposure before too much star movement is apparent.
Another thing working against me was the Sun was already making itself known
Last Milky Way for a while I promise by MedicineMan4040, on FlickrApr 15, 2018 at 10:55 AM
