rji2goleez wrote:
^ Beautiful Joshua . . . If I did more portrait work, I'd have to pick up either this or the Batis for sure!
Thank you, Bob! I would have picked up the Batis had the price been the way it is now, around $1,500. But now, with adapted lenses being able to get Eye-AF on the A9 and/or A7r III, it makes me less motivated to get that lens. It may have lens CA since it is an APO lens but I prefer the larger aperture for smoother bokeh rendition of the Sigma. In addition, with the Metabones V, I can add either the 1.4X or 2X TC if I need a little bit more reach with that lens. Not for portraits but for something else if push comes to shove in needing more reach.