philip_pj wrote:
[triff, xwing - fab low light color separation, image depth, the lens is so good people will be beside themselves searching for aberrations]
I am very happy with the Loxia. But no expert. Just an amateur of joy in pictures. If the pictures are bad, then I am solely to blame. The tool is fantastic.
xwing15 wrote:
I am very happy with the Loxia. But no expert. Just an amateur of joy in pictures. If the pictures are bad, then I am solely to blame. The tool is fantastic.
René
"I am very happy with the Loxia" I think I would be too René with shots like those! I may have to sell some stuff!
xwing15 wrote:
I am very happy with the Loxia. But no expert. Just an amateur of joy in pictures. If the pictures are bad, then I am solely to blame. The tool is fantastic.
René
Hm, still struggeling here, whether to get the Batis or the Loxia 85 - how do you find it to focus - with/ without EVF magnification? How precisely with the focus ring?
My impression is that the Loxia is optically a bit better than the already excellent Batis, question is if in real life photography that matters more than the (lack of) convenience and speed of AF...
Contax 100/3.5, a7r. [This lens has an optical formulation date of Feb 1980; many of the CY lens designs were done in the 1970s and early 80s; some CY tele lenses are very old.]
