^^ Great capture, Ronny, as always! You used the fisheye lens a fair amount I noticed. Don't you loose quite a bit in the defishing process, especially in the corners? Did you crop your images then?
AGeoJO wrote:
^^ Great capture, Ronny, as always! You used the fisheye lens a fair amount I noticed. Don't you loose quite a bit in the defishing process, especially in the corners? Did you crop your images then?
Thanks Joshua
Tried to keep the horizon in the middle and you don't get so much fisheye effect
This shot, I just straighten it slightly and Original (5901 x 3934) pixlar remain of 6000x4000
I love these fall images, but, at least to my eyes, they look a little fuzzy. Is anyone else seeing this? #1 and #4 are most noticeable to me. I don't think it's a focus issue, and given the hardware you're using I know the pixels are there (and they're optimized in every which way with that glass). I'm not sure if it's the way you uploaded or not, but I do think these could look even better.
Jon
Jon,
Thank you my PS action that I used got corrupted and the quality setting in the jpg compression was way off. I fixed it and reposted them. Thanks for pointing it out!
Chuck...Show more →
Hi Chuck...the new uploads look much better to me!
Gorgeous Ronny! I am enjoying your take on Iceland, which is showing a slightly different vision than the many images I've seen of Iceland. I know this was a fisheye, but your other shots with the 100 macro proves that lens is a Swiss Army knife in your hands. I hope you are not close to the end of your postings.
The WATE kicks some serious "booty", I would say . I haven't used mine for quite sometime after I got the Sony 16-35mm f/4 earlier in the year. What's the aperture used for those captures?
The WATE kicks some serious "booty", I would say . I haven't used mine for quite sometime after I got the Sony 16-35mm f/4 earlier in the year. What's the aperture used for those captures?