philber wrote:
Awesome shots, Bob! And to think that I start worrying when I need to crank my ISO above 400. I am such a wimp.
To stay in that spirit, shots from the chapel in Chantilly Palace, with ZM 35 f:1.4
Thanks! I was the same way . . . too much pixel peeping kept me from just shooting at high ISO. That changed on this recent trip and I just kept the camera on AutoISO. My favorite was a page or so back from an Amsterdam Canal that I shot at ISO 12,800.
navydoc wrote:
Thanks for the comments. Here is a 'before/after' look for comparison. Please keep in mind she wanted me to make her look as young as possible. http://www.ussoriskany.us/images/misc/DSC01463.gif
It was very kind of you to take that pictures,navydoc.Please assure your neibourgh that all all of them look great
Outstanding Iceland images Ronny! You certainly came back with a lot of "keepers." In looking at the wonderful shots with the Zeiss 21mm, I wonder how the new Loxia 21mm could possibly be better. You can really see the 3D effect in these. Beautiful.
Very nice images on this page...navydoc, Bob, twoeye, philber, Werner!
Probably will Loxia 21 be better at 2.8 and f4 . lower aperture it becomes probably more even
Biggest advantage is of course weigh 200g less.. no adapter.. so there's some weight to save..
+ weatherseal
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
