Thank you! It wasn't quite dark out and the moon was bright so I think it lit the sky weird. It was a quick edit too I will have to go back and take a look at it.
Or are you talking about the round lines? I saw those too and not really sure what they are it how they got there.
CameraBuff wrote:
Nice shot but what is going on with that sky?
alarsen77 wrote:
Thank you! It wasn't quite dark out and the moon was bright so I think it lit the sky weird. It was a quick edit too I will have to go back and take a look at it.
Or are you talking about the round lines? I saw those too and not really sure what they are it how they got there.
It is banding. Sometimes called posterization. In a nutshell, the dark gradient of the sky is captured with too little image data spread too far apart and it isn't blending smoothly. It is actually very common.
Can be fixed in Photoshop. Basic remedy is to add what everyone tries and remove: noise
Luta13 wrote:
It is banding. Sometimes called posterization. In a nutshell, the dark gradient of the sky is captured with too little image data spread too far apart and it isn't blending smoothly. It is actually very common.
Can be fixed in Photoshop. Basic remedy is to add what everyone tries and remove: noise
That is certainly not the camera, its simply compressing for web viewing. The RAW wont show that bad banding, but a tiny 640 pixel compressed pic posted on the Internet will.
alarsen77 wrote:
That is a great shot and its really making me want to pick up one of the 40 2.8
You certainly won't regret it! It's no exaggeration for me to say I've never had more fun with any lens ever than the fun the $130 40 is giving me, regardless of cost.
But no way have I ever used it to the effect that CoDa does....that should be an ad for it!
