Keep in mind that the original screenshot is almost 2560x1600. The only way for me to see your photo as a whole is to scroll along a whole bunch, seeing chunks at a time, or just to downsize it, which means that I see it the size I prefer, but without the sharpness that you intend. That image in this medium has no possibility of making any kind of impact, other than it is BIG.
And this is only a side issue anyway. You posting an image 2867 wide means that apart from a few people with high-end IBM monitors, no one will be able to see your image without scrolling, and probably a significant proportion of people will not even be able to see the full height, whereas just a few posts before you, someone posts a 600-wide panorama. I cannot understand that it seems I am the only person bothered by this. Are there only PC users here?
Keep in mind that the original screenshot is almost 2560x1600. The only way for me to see your photo as a whole is to scroll along a whole bunch, seeing chunks at a time, or just to downsize it, which means that I see it the size I prefer, but without the sharpness that you intend. That image in this medium has no possibility of making any kind of impact, other than it is BIG.
And this is only a side issue anyway. You posting an image 2867 wide means that apart from a few people with high-end IBM monitors will be able to see your image without scrolling, and probably a significant proportion of people will not even be able to see the full height, whereas just a few posts before you, someone posts a 600-wide panorama. I cannot understand that it seems I am the only person bothered by this. Are there only PC users here?
Jun 03, 2011 at 06:44 PM
Previous versions of carstenw's message #9645026 « Pano-mania »
