bacilonur wrote: miccullen wrote:
So what evidence, exactly, do you have that backward compatibility is the issue with the new PWs?
If the latest PWs had instead used a frequency closer to what RP chose, or any frequency far enough from the range that causes transmission attenuation from the PWs due to Canon\'s EMI, range and reliability would have been much better.
And given that PW have said that they didn\'t realise that the freq was a problem, (the flashed they bought to test it with didn\'t give them issues), should they have just changed it at random? To what end? That\'s not about backward-compatibility, that\'s about issues not showing up in testing.
Dec 18, 2009 at 05:01 PM
Previous versions of miccullen's message #7905587 « Einsteins 640....Dec?? »
