Josh Evilsizor wrote: PyroDenny wrote: Ryan Britton wrote:
It\'s standard, but it overstretches too much. A better version of that license would be to have it revocable and be revoked upon ending the use of their services. As it sits now, they can technically sell and distribute your photos after you have ceased using their services.
and the last part there reads like they could gather huge piles of stock photo\'s to sell... \"storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge.\"
wouldn\'t that be for the case of you say, shooting a sporting event, then setting up a gallery where players and parents can go to after the event to purchase images?
not if Mpix sets up an account on shutterstock or something dumps a huge amount of uploaded photo\'s from \"us\"
@Craig Gillette
okie dokie i just did not read the last line correctly
Josh Evilsizor wrote: PyroDenny wrote: Ryan Britton wrote:
It\'s standard, but it overstretches too much. A better version of that license would be to have it revocable and be revoked upon ending the use of their services. As it sits now, they can technically sell and distribute your photos after you have ceased using their services.
and the last part there reads like they could gather huge piles of stock photo\'s to sell... \"storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge.\"
wouldn\'t that be for the case of you say, shooting a sporting event, then setting up a gallery where players and parents can go to after the event to purchase images?
not if Mpix sets up an account on shutterstock or something dumps a huge amount of uploaded photo\'s from \"us\"
Jul 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Previous versions of PyroDenny's message #7350038 « Mpix Pro Rights Grab »
