This topic is in the 2009 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2009Mpix Pro Rights Grab
p.1 #1Mpix Pro Rights Grab
From the terms and conditions on the new Mpix Pro service.
You certify that you own all intellectual property rights in Your Content. You hereby grant Miller’s, our affiliates, and our partners a worldwide, irrevocable, royalty-free, nonexclusive, sub licensable license to use, reproduce, create derivative works of, distribute, publicly perform, publicly display, transfer, transmit, distribute, and publish Your Content and subsequent versions of Your Content for the purposes of (i) displaying Your Content on our Site, (ii) distributing Your Content, either electronically or via other media, to users seeking to download or otherwise acquire it, and/or (iii) storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge. This license shall apply to the distribution and the storage of Your Content in any form, medium, or technology now known or later developed.
Wow but that's a blatent rights grab and from a supposedly pro service. They can sell your wedding pics to your clients or run off a thousand copies of a limited edition print and there's not a thing you can do about it.
Spread the word people, Facebook backed down soon enough.
You certify that you own all intellectual property rights in Your Content. You hereby grant Miller’s, our affiliates, and our partners a worldwide, irrevocable, royalty-free, nonexclusive, sub licensable license to use, reproduce, create derivative works of, distribute, publicly perform, publicly display, transfer, transmit, distribute, and publish Your Content and subsequent versions of Your Content for the purposes of (i) displaying Your Content on our Site, (ii) distributing Your Content, either electronically or via other media, to users seeking to download or otherwise acquire it, and/or (iii) storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge. This license shall apply to the distribution and the storage of Your Content in any form, medium, or technology now known or later developed.
Wow but that's a blatent rights grab and from a supposedly pro service. They can sell your wedding pics to your clients or run off a thousand copies of a limited edition print and there's not a thing you can do about it.
Spread the word people, Facebook backed down soon enough.
Jul 27, 2009 at 04:25 AM
p.1 #2Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Wow, they are crazy!
That is just for images you send them for printing? I see that for contests all of the time.
That is just for images you send them for printing? I see that for contests all of the time.
Jul 27, 2009 at 07:58 AM
p.1 #3Mpix Pro Rights Grab
If that is true, they will not get any more of my business, for sure.
Jul 27, 2009 at 08:00 AM
p.1 #4Mpix Pro Rights Grab
umm... isn't that just standard legal jargon to allow them to host your images on their site for viewing by clients
Jul 27, 2009 at 08:52 AM
p.1 #5Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Beni wrote:
From the terms and conditions on the new Mpix Pro service.
Wow but that's a blatent rights grab and from a supposedly pro service. They can sell your wedding pics to your clients or run off a thousand copies of a limited edition print and there's not a thing you can do about it.
Spread the word people, Facebook backed down soon enough.
It's not a "blatant rights grab" considering they said that you own all the rights to your photos. Also, why would they sell your wedding pics to your clients or run off a thousand copies of a limited edition print? Is this actually within their best interests?
From the terms and conditions on the new Mpix Pro service.
Wow but that's a blatent rights grab and from a supposedly pro service. They can sell your wedding pics to your clients or run off a thousand copies of a limited edition print and there's not a thing you can do about it.
Spread the word people, Facebook backed down soon enough.
It's not a "blatant rights grab" considering they said that you own all the rights to your photos. Also, why would they sell your wedding pics to your clients or run off a thousand copies of a limited edition print? Is this actually within their best interests?
Jul 27, 2009 at 09:04 AM
p.1 #6Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Zenfolio has a similar clause
"By transmitting images or any other media to Zenfolio, Photographers grant Zenfolio a nonexclusive right to use, reproduce, transmit, publicly display, and distribute the images or other media as deemed appropriate by Zenfolio"
And I imagine any other service that allows you to set up galleries to sell images to clients will have the same thing... as I stated above it's just legal jargon to cover their asses and allow them to display the images you've uploaded.
"By transmitting images or any other media to Zenfolio, Photographers grant Zenfolio a nonexclusive right to use, reproduce, transmit, publicly display, and distribute the images or other media as deemed appropriate by Zenfolio"
And I imagine any other service that allows you to set up galleries to sell images to clients will have the same thing... as I stated above it's just legal jargon to cover their asses and allow them to display the images you've uploaded.
Jul 27, 2009 at 09:20 AM
p.1 #7Mpix Pro Rights Grab
It's standard, but it overstretches too much. A better version of that license would be to have it revocable and be revoked upon ending the use of their services. As it sits now, they can technically sell and distribute your photos after you have ceased using their services.
Jul 27, 2009 at 09:30 AM
p.1 #8Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Ryan Britton wrote:
It's standard, but it overstretches too much. A better version of that license would be to have it revocable and be revoked upon ending the use of their services. As it sits now, they can technically sell and distribute your photos after you have ceased using their services.
and the last part there reads like they could gather huge piles of stock photo's to sell... "storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge."
It's standard, but it overstretches too much. A better version of that license would be to have it revocable and be revoked upon ending the use of their services. As it sits now, they can technically sell and distribute your photos after you have ceased using their services.
and the last part there reads like they could gather huge piles of stock photo's to sell... "storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge."
Jul 27, 2009 at 09:43 AM
p.1 #9Mpix Pro Rights Grab
PyroDenny wrote:
and the last part there reads like they could gather huge piles of stock photo's to sell... "storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge."
wouldn't that be for the case of you say, shooting a sporting event, then setting up a gallery where players and parents can go to after the event to purchase images?
Ryan Britton wrote
It's standard, but it overstretches too much. A better version of that license would be to have it revocable and be revoked upon ending the use of their services. As it sits now, they can technically sell and distribute your photos after you have ceased using their services.wouldn't that be for the case of you say, shooting a sporting event, then setting up a gallery where players and parents can go to after the event to purchase images?
Jul 27, 2009 at 09:48 AM
p.1 #10Mpix Pro Rights Grab
"for the purposes of (i) displaying Your Content on our Site, (ii) distributing Your Content, either electronically or via other media, to users seeking to download or otherwise acquire it, and/or (iii) storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge. This license shall apply to the distribution and the storage of Your Content in any form, medium, or technology now known or later developed."
This says they will display it, distribute it and store it. "It" is "your content." The rest was lawyer talk. If they do more than display, distribute, and store, then they have violated the agreement. If they do less, then it seems that it's a wasted effort.
This says they will display it, distribute it and store it. "It" is "your content." The rest was lawyer talk. If they do more than display, distribute, and store, then they have violated the agreement. If they do less, then it seems that it's a wasted effort.
Jul 27, 2009 at 10:34 AM
p.1 #11Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Josh Evilsizor wrote:
and the last part there reads like they could gather huge piles of stock photo's to sell... "storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge."wouldn't that be for the case of you say, shooting a sporting event, then setting up a gallery where players and parents can go to after the event to purchase images?
not if Mpix sets up an account on shutterstock or something and dumps a huge amount of uploaded photo's from "us"
@Craig Gillette
okie dokie i just did not read the last line correctly
Edited on Jul 27, 2009 at 11:33 AM · View previous versions
PyroDenny wrote
Ryan Britton wrote
It's standard, but it overstretches too much. A better version of that license would be to have it revocable and be revoked upon ending the use of their services. As it sits now, they can technically sell and distribute your photos after you have ceased using their services.not if Mpix sets up an account on shutterstock or something and dumps a huge amount of uploaded photo's from "us"
@Craig Gillette
okie dokie i just did not read the last line correctly
Edited on Jul 27, 2009 at 11:33 AM · View previous versions
Jul 27, 2009 at 11:25 AM
p.1 #12Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Thank you for your help in bringing this error to our attention.
The terms and conditions mentioned were copied from our Miller’s Professional Imaging website and were written for our web hosting application only. These terms should not have been included on the Mpix.com or MpixPro.com websites and have been removed.
Again, thank you for bringing this to our attention and for understanding our regret in this error.
The terms and conditions mentioned were copied from our Miller’s Professional Imaging website and were written for our web hosting application only. These terms should not have been included on the Mpix.com or MpixPro.com websites and have been removed.
Again, thank you for bringing this to our attention and for understanding our regret in this error.
Jul 27, 2009 at 11:31 AM
p.1 #13Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Craig Gillette wrote:
"for the purposes of (i) displaying Your Content on our Site, (ii) distributing Your Content, either electronically or via other media, to users seeking to download or otherwise acquire it, and/or (iii) storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge. This license shall apply to the distribution and the storage of Your Content in any form, medium, or technology now known or later developed."
This says they will display it, distribute it and store it. "It" is "your content." The rest was lawyer talk. If they do more than display, distribute, and store, then...Show more →
Mmmm, display, distribute and store are pretty broad. I'd say "selling" fits nicely under distributing. As I read this, there is nothing to stop them from selling your stuff on a stock site, or making prints from your files and selling those, etc.
Nice of them to quickly remove this language from the agreement though.
"for the purposes of (i) displaying Your Content on our Site, (ii) distributing Your Content, either electronically or via other media, to users seeking to download or otherwise acquire it, and/or (iii) storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge. This license shall apply to the distribution and the storage of Your Content in any form, medium, or technology now known or later developed."
This says they will display it, distribute it and store it. "It" is "your content." The rest was lawyer talk. If they do more than display, distribute, and store, then...Show more →
Mmmm, display, distribute and store are pretty broad. I'd say "selling" fits nicely under distributing. As I read this, there is nothing to stop them from selling your stuff on a stock site, or making prints from your files and selling those, etc.
Nice of them to quickly remove this language from the agreement though.
Jul 27, 2009 at 11:41 AM
p.1 #14Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Wow - so mpixpro got the word and set up an account with FM just to post an apology and correction? Remarkable!
Jul 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM
p.1 #15Mpix Pro Rights Grab
Craig Gillette wrote:
"for the purposes of (i) displaying Your Content on our Site, (ii) distributing Your Content, either electronically or via other media, to users seeking to download or otherwise acquire it, and/or (iii) storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge. This license shall apply to the distribution and the storage of Your Content in any form, medium, or technology now known or later developed."
This says they will display it, distribute it and store it. "It" is "your content." The rest was lawyer talk. If they do more than display, distribute, and store, then...Show more →
The agreement allows them to do less, so it's not a wasted effort.
"for the purposes of (i) displaying Your Content on our Site, (ii) distributing Your Content, either electronically or via other media, to users seeking to download or otherwise acquire it, and/or (iii) storing Your Content in a remote database accessible by end users, for a charge. This license shall apply to the distribution and the storage of Your Content in any form, medium, or technology now known or later developed."
This says they will display it, distribute it and store it. "It" is "your content." The rest was lawyer talk. If they do more than display, distribute, and store, then...Show more →
The agreement allows them to do less, so it's not a wasted effort.
Jul 27, 2009 at 11:48 AM
p.1 #16Mpix Pro Rights Grab
adogzlife wrote:
Wow - so mpixpro got the word and set up an account with FM just to post an apology and correction? Remarkable!
And great that they are sensitive and responsive to this issue.
Wow - so mpixpro got the word and set up an account with FM just to post an apology and correction? Remarkable!
And great that they are sensitive and responsive to this issue.
Jul 27, 2009 at 01:06 PM
p.1 #17Mpix Pro Rights Grab
.
Edited on Jul 29, 2009 at 04:55 PM · View previous versions
Edited on Jul 29, 2009 at 04:55 PM · View previous versions
Jul 27, 2009 at 02:44 PM
p.1 #18Mpix Pro Rights Grab
pamkel wrote:
To set up an account at MPIX Pro you have to send them a number of 8x10's for them to determine if your quality is high enough.
is this sarcasm? You send them 5 files for them to print test prints so you can verify if you're colors are calibrated to their printers.
To set up an account at MPIX Pro you have to send them a number of 8x10's for them to determine if your quality is high enough.
is this sarcasm? You send them 5 files for them to print test prints so you can verify if you're colors are calibrated to their printers.Jul 27, 2009 at 03:02 PM
p.1 #19Mpix Pro Rights Grab
mpixpro wrote:
Again, thank you for bringing this to our attention and for understanding our regret in this error.
Thank you folks for being so responsive, and for taking the time to register and post!
Good to have you here.
Cheers,
Michael
Again, thank you for bringing this to our attention and for understanding our regret in this error.
Thank you folks for being so responsive, and for taking the time to register and post!
Good to have you here.
Cheers,
Michael
Jul 27, 2009 at 08:20 PM
p.1 #20Mpix Pro Rights Grab
pamkel wrote:
To set up an account at MPIX Pro you have to send them a number of 8x10's for them to determine if your quality is high enough. Shutterstock wants 10 full size images, non watermarked and with no copyright information in the exif fields. If they don't choose your first 10 they want 10 more in 30 days. To verify your identification they want either a copy of your passport or drivers license or use a credit card by charging .01 cent to the account. One cent identification verification alone gave them $176,000 bucks.
I'm glad that MPIX changed the wording.
For Shutterstock to make $176,000 off individual 1-cent charges, they would need to charge 17.6 million subscribers, but they only have about 180,000 active photographers, so the most they could probably make from 1-cent charges is $1800.
To set up an account at MPIX Pro you have to send them a number of 8x10's for them to determine if your quality is high enough. Shutterstock wants 10 full size images, non watermarked and with no copyright information in the exif fields. If they don't choose your first 10 they want 10 more in 30 days. To verify your identification they want either a copy of your passport or drivers license or use a credit card by charging .01 cent to the account. One cent identification verification alone gave them $176,000 bucks.
I'm glad that MPIX changed the wording.
For Shutterstock to make $176,000 off individual 1-cent charges, they would need to charge 17.6 million subscribers, but they only have about 180,000 active photographers, so the most they could probably make from 1-cent charges is $1800.
Jul 28, 2009 at 07:53 AM