I think too many become way too obsessed about the need/wish to have the absolute bestest. Sometimes a very good lens is more than good enough. At least this goes for me. If you\'re not able to make fab shots with the Sony system, then it doesn\'t matter what system you use. Except for special needs. Nothing wrong in discussing or wishing, but sometimes it goes way to out there IMO. If only this, if only that. IMO. What\'s wrong with the Sony 35/1.4? How may times to you really need 24/1.4 to make THE shot? The Sony 50/1.4 is IMO really, really good. It renders Leica-ish. You have ZA 16-35 and ZA 24-70. Both excellent. ZA 85 and ZA 135 are excellent. Sony 70-200 is apparently really good. Unless you are a wildlife/sports shooter, or need TS lenses, what is really missing? I could go on. My point is - there\'s nothing lacking in the Sony system in order to make fab shots except for some special needs. IMO.
Oct 23, 2012 at 10:21 AM
Previous versions of mortyb's message #11062586 « Sony RX1 FF Mirrorless (Original 2012 thread) »
