Upload & Sell: Off
| p.2 #7 · Battle of the Fifties |
what i find interesting is that the rokkor seems to beat pretty much all the lenses at f/1.4 (and f/1.2) at the borders, but then falls behind in the corners.
I noticed that too.
I'll reiterate someone's sentiments from before, you need to have two 50s.
For me, it's my most common focal length.
Ideally, I'd have the 50MP(or, honestly, a Zuiko 50/2) and the Rokkor 58 converted. I like native EF mount stuff.
As it stands now, I've got the Sigma 50. I'll always stand by it. I don't know that even if I could afford the 50L, I'd own it. The Sigma is 98% the L.
only two? that's crazy
i think this is probably the straw that breaks the camels back and finally pushes me into getting a rokkor 58/1.2. have to see whether the rokkor 50/1.4 stays after that.
Oh, if money were no object...I'd have like thirty different 50s.
Helios 44/2, Zuiko 50 1.4, Zuiko 2 Macro, Zuiko 50 1.2,Zuiko 55 1.2, Sigma 50, Rokkor 58, Noctilux, Summilux R, C/y 1.4, C/y 1.7, Zeiss 50 1.4, ZE 50 MP, Ai-S 1.2, Ai-1.4, Ai-S 1.4, Ai-S 55 1.2, 55/2 Ai-S Macro, 50/3.5 Ai-S, Canon FL 55, Canon 50L, SMC 50/1.4 & 1.7 ...
It's late can't think of any others.
oh yeah, 50/2.8 Tessar, Konica 50/2, Canon 50/2.5, R- Summicron,
Ok, I'm done for real now.
If you're wondering why I want to have all these lenses, it's because I've never collected anything. And besides cycling, photography is my only hobby. I don't have the room for bikes....so, lenses make sense.