leighton w Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
asiostygius wrote:
May I ask your pardon for sharing one more informal test with the 50-135mm at 135mm?
I promise this will be the last one.
Just to show how impressive this zoom appears to be.
Though not a scientific and rigorous test (ISOs and shutter speeds were different), I used the same light conditions (cloudy day), same f/11 and same PP.
Another trivial image, a ground view from my office window (~15m above).
The first is a view with the zoom at 135mm:

Test shot with Nikkor 50-135mm f/3.5 by labecoaves, on Flickr
Ground view from my office window ~15 m below.
D7000 + 50-135mm f/3.5 ais @ 135mm hand held but supported on the window sill, ISO 320, f/11 at 1/50s.
This is a heavy crop of the central portion of the previous image simulating a 400mm FOV:

Test shot with Nikkor 50-135mm f/3.5 - heavy crop at a 400mm FOV by labecoaves, on Flickr
D7000 + 50-135mm f/3.5 ais @ 135mm hand held but supported on the window sill, ISO 320, f/11 at 1/50s.
Now this is from my 400mm f/5.6 K ai´d ED, a well regarded and sharp lens:

Test shot Nikkor 400mm f/5.6 K ai'd - NO CROP by labecoaves, on Flickr
FOV of the same ground now with a 400mm lens - no crop.
D7000 + Nikkor 400mm f/5.6 K ai'd held but supported on the window sill, ISO 800, f/11 at 1/125s.
It is sure, the real 400mm lens delivers a slightly sharper image. But I think that the prime lens being just slightly sharper is a great testament to the 50-135mm zoom!
Well Jose, I believe you've become more of an advocate then I on the 50-135mm! Hard to dispute this testing of yours. What I'd like, is to find one in new condition. 
|