asiostygius Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Thanks Georg, Philippe, Jeff, Scott, Ray and John for the comments.
Ben, happy New Year, I think you is already some hours in 2013. Here we nee some 7h more
Georg, I am no "expert" on the TC16A, just intrigued as this little and overlooked piece of glass performs so well; though at FX bodies borders can suffer, at DX no problem and the center is very good.
Scott, I think both 55/2.8 and 105/2.8 are good at macro and at infinity.
My feelings/experiences (at least with my copies: two 55/2.8, one 55/3.5 and 2 105/2.8) revealed that in general the 55s are a little bit sharper and have almost no CA when compared to the 105/2.8. But the 105 micro is no slouch, far from that, and I was surprised with test results against the legendary 105/2.5:
see the first 14 shots here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/labecoaves/sets/72157630731799688/
|