Upload & Sell: Off
| p.4 #11 · Zeiss 25mm ZF.2 announced |
Sam tran wrote:
Check out this review from FM and see how many mentioned "CA" or similar comments... Did I mentioned the ZE 35/2 (not the ZF) ? It could be I had a "bad luck" copy, but others too?
A few mentioned CA, but usually with "slight", or "faint trace of", or similar modifying words with it. Completely consistent with what I have noticed. One said "quite a lot" of CA in the corners. But this is something I have not noticed. No manifestation of CA with this lens would I consider to be "quite a lot", even in harsh conditions. Certainly, the ZF/ZE 35 is by no means "bad" with respect to CA performance. In fact, it is probably better than most 35mm primes in this area. Even the one or 2 reviews there that could be considered critical of its CA performance, still consider it to be excellent, exceptional for the price, and unmatched by its competitors.
Maybe you got a bad copy, or maybe you naturally speak in hyperbole, I don't know. I can't see what you are seeing. In my use of the ZF 35/2, CA has never been an issue, a problem, or a concern. It has always performed well, certainly relative to other 35mm primes, in this area.
I don't use "landscape mode" in DPP, so maybe that helps with what I'm seeing.