Nah! a man of your ability could produce a shot like that from a pinhole in a matchbox, Paul! I am surprised that, to make matters just a bit more challenging, you didn't chosoe to do it while she blinked
sirimiri wrote:
Hmmm...how does it look "in living color"?
I have no idea, as these were taken under crappy indoor lighting. I haven't even mounted the lens on my camera yet, to be honest. Once I finish the conversion (which I've figured out quite easily) I will put it through more thorough testing and post some stuff.
Mr.Burns wrote:
The first one kinda reminds me of a LensBaby shot.
I like the look.
-Mickey
That makes sense, since I was holding the camera to my face with my right hand and holding the lens near the camera with the other hand. To focus, the mountless lens had to be held about 3-4mm away from the camera mount flange, so some tilt and shift was inevitable (I'm not that good). Sort of like Anden's Franken-tilt, but without the lens pouch "bellows".
philber wrote:
Nah! a man of your ability could produce a shot like that from a pinhole in a matchbox, Paul! I am surprised that, to make matters just a bit more challenging, you didn't chosoe to do it while she blinked
. Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I think I really would have needed AF if she had blinked
simiri, I've corrected the white balance quickly on a couple and dumped them out in colour. Probably not the best shots to judge colour with though, at 1600 under incandescent.
I'm excited to finish mine and get outside for some testing. I've read very good things about this lens. Some people call it the best lens in the FD line-up. Looking forward to seeing how it performs stopped down, as well.
This is a pretty easy conversion, eh? I'm not done yet, but it is so obvious what needs to be done.
Congrats on the 24 there are a few gems hidden in the FD line besides the 50L and 85L. To point out a few others for you of high regard 35 F2, 35-105 F3.5, 85 1.8, 80-200 L, 200 F4 macro and 400 F4.5.
Congrats on the 24 there are a few gems hidden in the FD line besides the 50L and 85L. To point out a few others for you of high regard 35 F2, 35-105 F3.5, 85 1.8, 80-200 L, 200 F4 macro and 400 F4.5.
Yes, I've already converted the 35/2 SSC (concave), and I love it.
I agree about the 35-105/3.5 as it was one of my favourites back in my AE-1P days. I converted a copy of that one too and it turned out to be a crap sample. I might do another some day.
I'm pretty content at 85mm these days (Rokinon) and for tele I have the FD 300/4 L converted (which is stunning!) and an AF 70-210/2.8 Zoom that is sufficient.
I asked about converting this lens a while back and got no response. I've seen tests of it that say it's extremely sharp, but I'm not sure if it'll clear a 5D/5DII mirror. If it will, I'm all for converting it.
As far as I can tell, it'll clear an unshaved mirror at infinity, but I cannot be sure just yet. I'll know more after the weekend. Maybe Nick can comment on this.
BTW, I know some of you must be wondering why the hell I've bought this lens since my main agenda has been selling stuff these days. Let's just say I couldn't pass up a deal this good
Ed Sawyer wrote:
The bokeh on the nFD one seems a bit busier than Paul's samples...
-Ed
I noticed this too, but oddly enough the lenses are identical. Canon only ever made the nFD version. I forgot to prepend the "n" in my original post.
Maybe it is because my "hand-holding" resulted in a closer-than-normal minimum focus distance (tube effect), resulting in narrower DOF and more blur. Also, the lighting is much more bright/contrasty in Nick's samples.
I'm excited to finish mine and get outside for some testing. I've read very good things about this lens. Some people call it the best lens in the FD line-up. Looking forward to seeing how it performs stopped down, as well.
This is a pretty easy conversion, eh? I'm not done yet, but it is so obvious what needs to be done.
Thanks Paul,
The nFD conversions are a breeze now that I have developed a ``kit`` to do it. The mounting screw locations and spacer requirements are identical in all the nFD lenses. I always have several M42/EOS adapters drilled with countersunk holes ready to go as well as dozens of spacers with holes and aperture ring "undercuts". When I get an nFD lens now I only have to drill out and re-tap the screw holes and fabricate the aperture control mechanism (which I have also stream-lined to some degree).
Although I have now shaved the mirror on my 5D I can confirm that the nFD 24/2 did clear before shaving.
A word of caution on the the 24mm nFDs. I converted an f 2.8 version first and I can report that the design was identical. In both lenses there was a set of bushings that I have never encountered in any other lens. The bushings are tiny....maybe 4mm in dia. In both lenses these bushings were worn out or had broken down from old lubricant. The lenses were both functional as they were but there was some "lost motion" in the focus rings as well as a tendency for the focus to creep under certain conditions when gravity could take hold. I ended up machining new bushings from teflon that work great.
