stanj Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #15 · 14-24/17TS/21ZE/24TS in a church | |
mfoto wrote:
Thanks Stan. Of course I say "probably not that bad" as a way of telling myself that it's probably good enough for me, for now, and I won't have to worry about shelling out the dollars for one of these wonders. As you know I'm also considering the 24 1.4L II. I am taking my time in making this decision but hope to have wide prime in my bag before a trip in the spring.
Well it depends on what you need I have the 24L2 as well, and love it. The original 24L was my favorite lens for more than a decade, and the 24L2 is a worthy replacement (unlike the whole 16-35 upgrade ). I'd say it greatly depends on what you need - I have the 24L not for super sharp images but rather for low light work wide open or close to that. I think if you can put the camera on a tripod then most lenses will do fine at f11 - some may do better than others, but by and large they will be all good. I don't have the TSEs for their sharpness but more for the shifting. I had the 24TSE (mk1) as well, and while it didn't scream "pixel peep me!" on the 1Ds3 it was certainly a great lens for its purpose. The new ones are just better
|