mauriceramirez Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Love this work. Please post more. Great styling and location. High production values here, how many people were on the set?
I wouldn't worry about the crop for the cover. Designers prefer vertical for their layouts and certainly for cover. Sucks, because I think that 99.999999% of the world's best shots are horizontal. Just think about how we're all getting screwed with the 8x10 "standard" frame size--talk about perpetual minor irritations. Anyway, just be happy you got the cover! In the editorial world that's huge. Unfortunately it means they probably didn't use this wonderful image at all, inside.
Those turned off by chest bones are not in the mag's target market. Models have to be skinny; clothes drape, frames pose, and light cuts--all better with skinny chicks.
I think the posing and lighting in #1 seems a little forced, in contrast to the others in the set.
#2 the model's face and expression is a bit masculine for the dress, and lighting's a little too cool in the shadows.
I really like the natural posing and airy palette to either crops (and flip) of #3.
All nit picks. Great set! Very inspiring, I want to go out and try to more gigs with couture bridal designers now.
-m
Edited on Nov 08, 2009 at 07:01 PM · View previous versions
|