fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of mauriceramirez's message #7748425 « Bridal Fashion Editorial »

  

mauriceramirez
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Bridal Fashion Editorial


Love this work. Please post more. Great styling and location. High production values here, how many people were on the set?

I wouldn\'t worry about the crop for the cover. Designers prefer vertical for their layouts and certainly for cover. Sucks, because I think that 99.999999% of the world\'s best shots are horizontal. Just think about how we\'re all getting screwed with the 8x10 \"standard\" frame size--talk about perpetual minor irritations. Anyway, just be happy you got the cover! In the editorial world that\'s huge. Unfortunately it means they probably didn\'t use this wonderful image at all, inside.

Those turned off by chest bones are not in the mag\'s target market. Models have to be skinny; clothes drape, frames pose, and light cuts--all better with skinny chicks.

I think the posing and lighting in #1 seems a little pedestrian, in contrast to the others in the set.

#2 the model\'s face and expression is a bit masculine for the dress, and lighting\'s a little too cool in the shadows.

I really like the natural posing and airy palette to either crops (and flip) of #3.

All nit picks. Great set! Very inspiring, I want to go out and try to more gigs with couture bridal designers now.

-m



Nov 08, 2009 at 02:00 PM
mauriceramirez
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Bridal Fashion Editorial


Love this work. Please post more. Great styling and location. High production values here, how many people were on the set?

I wouldn\'t worry about the crop for the cover. Designers prefer vertical for their layouts and certainly for cover. Sucks, because I think that 99.999999% of the world\'s best shots are horizontal. Just think about how we\'re all getting screwed with the 8x10 \"standard\" frame size--talk about perpetual minor irritations. Anyway, just be happy you got the cover! In the editorial world that\'s huge. Unfortunately it means they probably didn\'t use this wonderful image at all, inside.

Those turned off by chest bones are not in the mag\'s target market. Models have to be skinny; clothes drape, frames pose, and light cuts--all better with skinny chicks.

I think the posing and lighting in #1 seems a little too intentional, in contrast to the others in the set.

#2 the model\'s face is a bit masculine for the dress and lighting\'s a little too cool in the shadows.

I really like the natural posing and airy palette to either crops (and flip) of #3.

All nit picks. Great set! Very inspiring, I want to go out and try to more gigs with couture bridal designers now.

-m



Nov 08, 2009 at 01:58 PM
mauriceramirez
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Bridal Fashion Editorial


Love this work. Please post more. Great styling and location. High production values here, how many people were on the set?

I wouldn\'t worry about the crop for the cover. Designers almost crop horizontal for their layouts. Definitely, obviosly for a cover. Sucks, because I think that better shots are almost always horizontal. Just think about how we\'re all getting screwed with the 8x10 \"standard\" frame size--talk about perpetual minor irritations. Just be happy you got the cover! In the ed world that\'s big props. Unfortunately it means they probably won\'t used it big inside.

Those turned off by chest bones are not in the mag\'s target market. Models have to be skinny; clothes drape, frames pose, and light cuts--all better with skinny chicks.

I think the posing and lighting in #1 seems a little too intentional, in contrast to the others in the set.

#2 the model\'s face is a bit masculine for the dress and lighting\'s a little too cool in the shadows.

I really like the natural posing and airy palette to either crops (and flip) of #3.

All nit picks. Great set! Very inspiring, I want to go out and try to more gigs with couture bridal designers now.

-m



Nov 08, 2009 at 01:55 PM
mauriceramirez
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Bridal Fashion Editorial


Love this work. Please post more. Great styling and location. High production values here, how many people were on the set?

Those turned off by chest bones are not in the mag\'s target market. Models have to be skinny; clothes drape, frames pose, and light cuts--all better with skinny chicks.

I think the posing and lighting in #1 seems a little too intentional, in contrast to the others in the set.

#2 the model\'s face is a bit masculine for the dress and lighting\'s a little too cool in the shadows.

I really like the natural posing and airy palette to either crops (and flip) of #3.

All nit picks. Great set! Very inspiring, I want to go out and try to more gigs with couture bridal designers now.

-m



Nov 08, 2009 at 01:48 PM





  Previous versions of mauriceramirez's message #7748425 « Bridal Fashion Editorial »