Steve Ickes Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.3 #11 · Thinking of Switching Back to Canon | |
Chad S wrote:
Steve Ickes wrote:Feels like holding onto a brick.
I actually feel like my D700 is more brick like than the 1D.
The 1D kind of melts into my hands. It feels like you're holding on to a well crafted weapon.
And hence my comments concerning it being a very subjective choice. For me, and my larger hands, the Nikons feel much better. I typically shoot with two bodies, one with a 400mm f2.8 lens mounted on a monopod, the other slung over my shoulder with a 80-200. I always had trouble grabbing the Canon, one-handed, activating AF, framing and getting the shot. Canon's always felt as if they were going to fall out of my hand. I have no such issue with the Nikons as they are just better balanced . . . for me.
As far as craftmanship, you really can't say that either Canon or Nikon is better than the other. Both companies pro bodies are built with the utmost in quality. And as far as getting the job done, either with work equally well despite what some may say.
As far a megapixels when is enough too much? I've printed 20x30 images from my Canon MK II's, MK III's, Nikon D700 and D3's with equal results unless they are low light high ISO shots then the Nikons have easily ruled. I've shot all those listed in low light, high ISO settings and there is just no comparison not so much in the amount of noise but the type and quality of that noise.
If you're current camera does what you need then keep it and invest the money in more glass, better lighting, or other equipment that will actually enhance what you're currently doing.
|