Lars Johnsson Online Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #11 · Rugged Tripod Recommendation? | |
1fspeed wrote:
I might be in the minority, but I think the carbon fiber tripod thing is pointless. When you consider he weight of the camera, lens, and the camera bag over your shoulder, you spent $2-300 extra to shave 3-5% of the total weight. In addition, I haven't seen any image comparisons to that prove carbon fibers superior dampening (as a material it is better, but can you see it in the resulting photo?)
Rugged being a consideration - when CF fails, is does so rather spectacularly. Consider shooting on a rock shore, tripod legs straddling some boulders, you slip, lean on the tripod a bit too hard. The CF leg shatters, the AL leg kinks and bends. Your on a $20,000 Antarctica trip with a two legged CF tripod or a Al tripod with a crooked leg, but otherwise fully functional.
I happily carry the Aluminum tripod.
Yes CF weight less, but it's also stronger than aluminum. So all those scenario's you wrote about, will more likely happen with a alu tripod than with a CF.
There is a reason all the riders in Tour de France have stopped using alu and use CF instead and that's because they need a very strong bike when going up and down in the alps
|