stargazer78 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #9 · Canon S90 - I'm very impressed! | |
senna4ever wrote:
I was lent an S90 for the weekend by Canon. We were very disappointed by its barrel distortion. The jpegs were ok, but the RAW files were gross. There would be way too much work involved to correct them. I was saddened, as it looked so promising on paper, but a few minutes or testing revealed itself. I still prefer the LX3 over the S90.
The barrel distortion on the LX3 lens just as horrible as the S90's. The only difference is that Canon honestly presents the problem on their RAW files. On the other hand, the LX3 cheats by forcing (most) RAW processors to hide the problem. This is true for all the latest generation of Panasonic cameras, including the G-series.
I think most people would agree that RAW files should be kept, well... RAW, And I don't think anybody should be commending Panasonic for cheating, and trashing Canon for being honest.
Shooting JPEGs on the S90 corrects the problem automatically. On the other hand, if you shoot RAW you can have DPP correct the problem automatically. It adds about 3 mouse clicks to process your entire batch of RAW files. It's not at all "too much work".
|