Lotusm50 Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
Alf Beharie wrote:
Lotusm50 wrote:
Alf Beharie wrote:
Lotusm50 wrote:
RustyBug wrote:
Which has more 3d ??
135mm 3.5 f8
135mm 3.5 f3.5
The one at f8.
Actually I think the f3.5 one has better 3D because the watering can spout stands out more against the more blurred background than in the f8 shot. However for the best effect you should copy the f8 watering can spout onto the f3.5 watering can spout with photoshop. This will give an even sharper spout standing out against a more blurred background and thus it will look more 3D.
This is crux of the what people consider to be "3-D". To me, "3-D" is not the illusion of space between objects -- which is easily done by opening up the lens to increase differential focus. To me, and I believe many others, "3-D" is the ability to create a compelling illusion of a form in 3 dimensions. In this image, 3-D is about the watering can and how the watering can appears to the viewer. It's not about the separation between the watering can and the background.
But the separation between the watering can and the background is very important in giving a 3D effect...The sharper you make the watering can in relation to the background the greater the 3D effect.
I guess we'll have to essentially disagree about that -- basically I think we are talking about 2 different things.
|