Register · Search · Software · Join Upload & Sell · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

FM Forum Rules
FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell   
Search Used
end
  

Archive 2009 · simple lighting shot with diagram
  
 
profotosstudio
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · simple lighting shot with diagram




This image is copyrighted by the owner





This image is copyrighted by the owner




Oct 25, 2009 at 01:46 PM
kylegehmlich
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · simple lighting shot with diagram


Nicely done Setups are always fun to see.

Oct 25, 2009 at 02:47 PM
profotosstudio
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · simple lighting shot with diagram


kylegehmlich wrote:
Nicely done Setups are always fun to see.

Pleasure

Oct 25, 2009 at 08:28 PM
irish-george
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · simple lighting shot with diagram


Thanks. I like comparing results with set-ups. Are the right angles on either side of the model walls or scrims?

Oct 25, 2009 at 08:37 PM
profotosstudio
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · simple lighting shot with diagram


irish-george wrote:
Thanks. I like comparing results with set-ups. Are the right angles on either side of the model walls or scrims?

simple black panel boards.

Oct 26, 2009 at 01:21 PM
 



cgardner
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · simple lighting shot with diagram


A different way to light the same pose more effectively (IMHO) would have been to put the key light on the left, about 45 degrees from her nose which would have produced more flattering short light on the face (which is half in shadow here) and rim-lit the breast and red top putting in mostly in shadow. Also FWIW the facial angle relative to the camera is making the far side of the face disappear.

Its all a matter of subjective taste of course but on dark backgrounds I find more balanced, short-lit oblique views of faces more flattering than broad-lit ones. The perceptual cause and effect is influenced by the background tone causing the eye to instinctively search out contrasts from it. The lighting on the subject here, if photographed on a white background would make it easier to see the far side of the face because it would contrast more with the white background. Here the problem is it blends into similar dark one. What contrast the most tends to attract the most attention perceptually and in this shot the brightest highlights are on the back, not the front of her face.

The reason short lighting is so effective on dark backgrounds is because absent any clothing brighter than the skin the front of the face winds up having the brightest highlights in the photo, which acts like a magnet to pull the eye into the face. Short lighting the breast would rim light it and reveal its bullet shape in a more subtle way that didn't compete with the face as it does here.

It's a pretty woman in a provocative pose that would be "good" in any light. What I'm suggesting here is more akin to editing the delivery of the elements in the photo so the FRONT of the face would have more emphasis that the side of the head, back, breast, tattoo, etc. On a dark stage the star of the show needs to be in the spotlight.

Chuck

Oct 26, 2009 at 02:00 PM
profotosstudio
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · simple lighting shot with diagram


cgardner wrote:
A different way to light the same pose more effectively (IMHO) would have been to put the key light on the left, about 45 degrees from her nose which would have produced more flattering short light on the face (which is half in shadow here) and rim-lit the breast and red top putting in mostly in shadow. Also FWIW the facial angle relative to the camera is making the far side of the face disappear.

Its all a matter of subjective taste of course but on dark backgrounds I find more balanced, short-lit oblique views of faces more flattering than broad-lit ones. The perceptual cause and effect is influenced by the background tone causing the eye to instinctively search out contrasts from it. The lighting on the subject here, if photographed on a white background would make it easier to see the far side of the face because it would contrast more with the white background. Here the problem is it blends into similar dark one. What contrast the most tends to attract the most attention perceptually and in this shot the brightest highlights are on the back, not the front of her face.

The reason short lighting is so effective on dark backgrounds is because absent any clothing brighter than the skin the front of the face winds up having the brightest highlights in the photo, which acts like a magnet to pull the eye into the face. Short lighting the breast would rim light it and reveal its bullet shape in a more subtle way that didn't compete with the face as it does here.

It's a pretty woman in a provocative pose that would be "good" in any light. What I'm suggesting here is more akin to editing the delivery of the elements in the photo so the FRONT of the face would have more emphasis that the side of the head, back, breast, tattoo, etc. On a dark stage the star of the show needs to be in the spotlight.

Chuck

All good points Chuck!
Alan

Oct 26, 2009 at 11:51 PM
Michael White
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · simple lighting shot with diagram


Since you gave finite values how about updating your diagram to specify the equipment used. Or go to the better +/- stops for reference values. It would make it more universal. That way everyone can get the same results using your diagram. the later method is a better way to speak of light since that is what we see. Not f/8 or f/5.6

Oct 27, 2009 at 01:20 AM
profotosstudio
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · simple lighting shot with diagram


Michael White wrote:
Since you gave finite values how about updating your diagram to specify the equipment used. Or go to the better +/- stops for reference values. It would make it more universal. That way everyone can get the same results using your diagram. the later method is a better way to speak of light since that is what we see. Not f/8 or f/5.6


Sorry, you lost me?

Oct 27, 2009 at 06:38 PM
shatterkiss
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · simple lighting shot with diagram


profotosstudio wrote:
Sorry, you lost me?


I believe he means indicating what any individual source meters at relative to the main light or camera exposure. So if you were shooting at f/8 and your fill was at f/4, you'd diagram it as being at -2 stops.

Oct 27, 2009 at 06:42 PM
end




FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost your password?