Scott Sewell Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
Travis, I won't mention the crops since several already have...woops, I just did. The majority of these are just way loose. Also, I rarely comment on horizons, but that field goal with the goal post is just a no-brainer. Hard to really tell what's going on in that photo anyway, so that's one I'm not sure I'd have kept.
You are certainly pushing the limits of what you can get without flash. I would suggest trying a shutter speed of 1/400 or even 1/320. Yea, I know we always hear 1/500 is the low end, but you can get decent action at 1/400 and even at 1/320. You just have to accept that your keeper rate isn't going to be as high.
Here are a couple at 1/400


And here is at 1/320:

IMO, it's obviously important to stop action, but if the faces under the helmets are nothing but dark blobs then you're really not accomplishing much. Like flash or not, that's really why people have to use it...to be able to actually the subjects in the image.
ponceii wrote:
I'm going to be taking some photos tonight of a football game and plan on shooting @ ISO 3200 with the exposure compensation setted up by at least 1 using a Canon 1DMKII with 70-200mm 2.8 IS. I'm wondering it there will be an issue with me using a 100-400mm 4.5/5.6 lens underneath the lights since I haven't done so before.
Are you planning to shoot action or the players/cheerleaders just standing on the sideline?
Not gonna capture action at night with a variable aperture lens unless you try to do some sort of panning or creative shots. f2.8 is often not enough, certainly not at many HS facilities.
Good luck.
|