It's actually not important what I think of it, it's much more important what YOU think. If YOU think it's okay, than it is okay.
I like the framing from the 2nd more.
It's actually not important what I think of it, it's much more important what YOU think. If YOU think it's okay, than it is okay.
I like the framing from the 2nd more.
Dick,
Thanks for the input. Could you clarify dimensionless? I know what that means as math term but not in this context. I am fine with the image in it's pure B&W photographic form but thought I would experiment with textures etc.
I like the second one with more texture better, it gives it more dimensionality, as opposed to being dimensionless. I think the term "dimensionless" just means it looks rather flat, whereas in the second image, the person tends to pull more toward the foreground, i.e., more 3d'ish.
Jo Dilbeck wrote:
I like the second one with more texture better, it gives it more dimensionality, as opposed to being dimensionless. I think the term "dimensionless" just means it looks rather flat, whereas in the second image, the person tends to pull more toward the foreground, i.e., more 3d'ish.
Jo
Thanks Jo. Your comments are very helpful. I agree, the second version has a more 3D feel.