p.1 #1 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
Ok, I relize this has been to some extent discussed before, though mostly based on the threads I looked at things got muddied up with slideshows for sale, etc.
I'm trying to wrap my mind around wether it really is enforceably illegal to use music on your website.
Try as I might I can't quite understand how SONY would and could successfully sue me for having music I legally purchased on CD playing on my web photography gallery, if they would not (and I suppose could not) sue me for having music I legally purchased on CD playing in my phisical photography gallery.
This is NOT about creating slideshows for sale for customers with copywrighted music on them. I can understand how that might appear to be "reselling" their product, but why is it ok to play a CD in a physical store, but not to play the same CD in an online store?
I've searched google in vain trying to find an example of a website being sued for PLAYING legally purchased music, and could not find a single instance. I also tried to specify photographer sued for music on website... and again... nothing.
Could someone please point me to where I can read about how it's ILLEGAL to play music on my site but LEGAL to play music in my store?
Of course if the deal is that it was never legal to play music in the store, then good luck... nearly EVERY freggin' store in America does that. If nobody's ever gotten sued I'm probably NOT going to be the first.
And yeah... if I DO get sued by some big muzac company THAT will be my defense: "Explain why it's ok for Joe Schmoe to play the CD in their physical store but I do the same on my online store and suddenly I'm some sort of underworld criminal."
p.1 #5 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
you have to pay for music for the same reason that a musician would have to pay a usage fee to license an image you shot of him.
want it for your mommy's mantle? $50+
want it for a poster that will be plastered all over the city? $500+
want it for your CD cover that's being released nationwide? $5000+
when teenage girls see your hunky picture of their favorite boy band on that CD cover, they rush to get it. your work + their work = dollars in that musician's pocket. you deserve a chunk of that change.
likewise, you use that musicians work paired with your images to evoke an emotion that compels a client to book, thereby putting money in YOUR pocket... well. the musician deserves a chunk of that change.
and here are brochures, explaining music copyright and licensing in layman's terms: http://www.ascap.com/licensing/brochures.html (the one called Using Copyrighted Music - under the Music in Business section is particularly helpful)
p.1 #6 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
oh and here's the reg re: use in stores:
Exemption from payment for radio and TV music for eating and drinking establishments of less than 3,750 gross square feet, and for retail businesses of less than 2,000 square feet, plus additional equipment exemption for some larger establishments. Medium to larger establishments are still required to pay for music licenses.
p.1 #8 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
ksmahgrts wrote:
oh and here's the reg re: use in stores:
Exemption from payment for radio and TV music for eating and drinking establishments of less than 3,750 gross square feet, and for retail businesses of less than 2,000 square feet, plus additional equipment exemption for some larger establishments. Medium to larger establishments are still required to pay for music licenses.
That's only a small part of it. There's no exemption for playing tapes, CDs, iPod, etc., only radio and TV. Presumably a photog isn't going to tune to "Hot 99.1" in the studio...
p.1 #9 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
sk5t wrote:
That's only a small part of it. There's no exemption for playing tapes, CDs, iPod, etc., only radio and TV. Presumably a photog isn't going to tune to "Hot 99.1" in the studio...
of course that's only a part of it... hence all the other links.
p.1 #11 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
ksmahgrts wrote:
of course that's only a part of it... hence all the other links.
The OP specifically mentioned playing CDs in his shop, and how that is "okay." The exemption you posted does not apply to CDs, but not-lisy might have interpreted it as applicable on the basis of the square-footage guidelines and so on.
That said, I'd be interested to know if something like pandora or last.fm counts as radio play, as there are no commercials, and you can more closely get what you want, than dealing with terrestrial radio.
Sep 20, 2009 at 01:11 AM
monoatomic72 Offline • • [X]
p.1 #12 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
Have you ever tried making one or more songs into a nice segue of your photos?
You can probably get away with fair use of a mashup of songs. Picking some that work well together, could help tell the story of the pictures.
For instance if you have a set of happy go lucky dancing people in a wedding, playing sad soft love music, it's a bit of a contrast. Playing faster upbeat music while showing pictures of the MOB crying, again, not so great.
I haven't seen if done before, but I think a nice mix of some good music, strong editing, and good timing could really put a photo gallery over the top. A nice soundtrack that complimented your photos instead of one static song playing throughout the album might work very well.
p.1 #13 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
The artists. Spring Awakening granted me permission, another contact I spoke with said it woul be "..too much of a hassle" to obtain written permission, but he was sure they wouldn't care and to "..just go for it", etc.
p.1 #14 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
The bottom line is that is isn't legal, even though in many cases its highly unlikely that you would get caught. Especially with playing music in your studio. Nevertheless copyright-karma isn't something I want to draw the ire of and I've legally licensed popular music for use on my site. One of these days, someone's going to rip off some of your images and make money off of them - do you want to feel that you deserved it?
We are agents in the copyright struggle, and we owe it to our industry to set a good example and enforce good copyright standards, not try to circumvent them. Be professional by being responsible.
p.1 #15 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
p.s. - oh yeah, the "Joe Schmo" defence, where you claim that someone else was doing it so you should be able to also never works. Try that next time you try to get out of a speeding ticket.
p.1 #16 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
So far ksmahgrts is the only that provided something of substance for what is requested. This is like listening to your customers....provide what was asked for folks.
p.1 #18 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
TRReichman wrote:
p.s. - oh yeah, the "Joe Schmo" defence, where you claim that someone else was doing it so you should be able to also never works. Try that next time you try to get out of a speeding ticket.
I have to disagree.
This is actually one of the few (if not the only) areas of the law where the "Joe Schmo" defense can actually work.
If you know of infringement of your copyright AND DO NOT do everything you can to stop it, you are weakened in future cases. Therefore the argument "Photographic studios, shoe stores, gift card stores, etc. etc. etc. etc. have been playing music from CDs they legally bought for DECADES, it's unreasonable to presume that you were not aware of this, and I can't find single case where you actually sued them" may in fact be the only defense that gets you off the hook.
p.1 #20 · Legality of using music on a website - part 749
ksmahgrts wrote:
you have to pay for music for the same reason that a musician would have to pay a usage fee to license an image you shot of him.
want it for your mommy's mantle? $50+
want it for a poster that will be plastered all over the city? $500+
want it for your CD cover that's being released nationwide? $5000+
when teenage girls see your hunky picture of their favorite boy band on that CD cover, they rush to get it. your work + their work = dollars in that musician's pocket. you deserve a chunk of that change.
Grits,
thanks for the references, I will check them out.
As to the above... that's the kind of argument I keep seeing touted over and over and over, and quite frankly IMHO it's apples and oranges.
The problem with the mommy's mantle = $50 but plastered all over the city =$500 but nationwide CD distribution = $5000 is NOT really one of what the client did with the image, but rather REPRODUCTION.
I suspect that if someone took the 8x10 they bought for mommy's mantle, carefully cut it to the size of a cd box and placed it in a cd case, the photographer would NOT expect additional compensation.
In the same way, if I take some nice portraits of you and you buy a 20x30 print you pay me $XXX.00 for it. You can put it in your living room, or you can put it in your Restaurant lobby and I'm fine either way. It only becomes an issue if you think you're going to take that one print, make hundreds of copies and put them up in your 5,000 locations that we have an issue.
If I'm understanding this correctly, the bottom line is that it was never legal to begin with to install a stereo system in your store and play CDs you bought at BestBuy over the speakers, not that the rules are different for a web gallery vs. a physical art gallery.
hence all the other links.