Register · Search · Software · Join Upload & Sell · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

Sports Corner Rules
Sports Corner Resource
FM Forums | Sports Corner | Join Upload & Sell   
Search Used
1
   2   end
  

Archive 2009 · 400 vs 300
  
 
kateman
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · 400 vs 300


i need the pros opinions...
iandi own a canon 300 is. just made
a significant sale and am pondering
upgrade to the 400 is.
should i or should i not hold onto the 300?
fwiw... i shoot prep and D1 sports. the
300 w/ 1.4 has been good to me when
the light has been good, but under the
lights, even at D1, the 1.4 is limiting.
soo... pls, all you pros, give me your
thoughts
thanks
b

Aug 24, 2009 at 03:30 AM
TheDoc65
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · 400 vs 300


I have and use both often. Can't bring myself to sell the 300. Just too useful.

Aug 24, 2009 at 03:54 AM
Scott Sewell
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · 400 vs 300


This has been discussed all over these forums before and you'll get a wide range of perspectives. I think most pros would say given the choice between a 300/f2.8 or a 400/f2.8 the winner would be the 400. My choice? 400. Hands down.

BTW, is it just me or are we seeing more gear threads around here lately? I personally think one benefit of not discussing gear on this specific forum is that it's really not about the gear. Doesn't hurt to ask someone what gear they used to get certain shots, but I hope we don't continue to see posts like this one.

Case in point, the OP appears to have made a "significant sale" of an image (I'm assuming it's an image sale) while using whatever gear he had at his disposal (which evidently didn't include a 400/f2.8).

Aug 24, 2009 at 03:57 AM
Marty Bingham
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · 400 vs 300


Given a choice I would keep the 300.

Owning a 400mm doesn't make good business sense for me though. I can rent one locally like 70 times for what one costs. Considering how many times I actually need one (rather than just wanting one) I could stretch that money out over six years or so. In the mean time there's lots of other things I can do with the lump sum of six to eight grand.

Of course if it's more of a toy than a business tool, by all means, knock yourself out and enjoy!!

Marty

Aug 24, 2009 at 10:31 AM
John--G
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · 400 vs 300


I used a 300 w/1.4X for a couple of years and then sold it to get the 400. There is simply no comparison. The 400 wins hands down. If you shoot field sports the 400/2.8 is the quintessential lens to have on the end of your monopod.





Aug 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM
WalnutPond
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · 400 vs 300


I bought the 300/2.8, wish I had the 400/2.8. I'll probably buy one next year or so, having said that I think I'll probably keep the 300 when I do - it's just too painful to sell L glass


Aug 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM
Jonathan Knight
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · 400 vs 300


I'd go 400. Almost always unless you shoot an inordinate amount of basketball. When was the last time you were wish for LESS glass? Probably been a while ...

The 400 is hands down the best for any sport you can name. I would find the 300 too short for football, baseball, softball, rugby, soccer, golf (for sure), even tennis or track.

Aug 24, 2009 at 02:21 PM
msauk
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · 400 vs 300


whenever I used my 300 it seems like I always had the 1.4 on it. Now with my 400 I never used the 1.4tc on it.

Though I might try it this week for football to see how it works

Aug 24, 2009 at 03:24 PM
11210
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · 400 vs 300


TheDoc65 wrote:
I have and use both often. Can't bring myself to sell the 300. Just too useful.


That is where I am too. I figured that when I got my 400mm I'd sell my 300mm. But the 300mm is a great lens too. For field sports I use my 400mm all the time but for indoor sports and other news type events the 300mm is great. Also when I'm shooting D1 football I'll often have an assistant with me and then I carry both the 300mm and 400mm. (ok I don't carry them - the assistant does. )

Aug 24, 2009 at 05:28 PM
kateman
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · 400 vs 300


thanks, everyone, for the opinions.
b



Aug 24, 2009 at 05:33 PM
 



HAYNBUCKEYE
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · 400 vs 300


Try it! You might like it!

Aug 24, 2009 at 06:13 PM
PierreB
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #12 · 400 vs 300


TheDoc65 wrote:
I have and use both often. Can't bring myself to sell the 300. Just too useful.


+1.

I have both, use both and also have a 600/4 when I need more reach. If I had to pick just one though, it would be the 400 for its versatility and amazing IQ.

Aug 24, 2009 at 07:40 PM
Deborah Kolt
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #13 · 400 vs 300


PierreB wrote:
TheDoc65 wrote:
I have and use both often. Can't bring myself to sell the 300. Just too useful.


+1.

I have both, use both and also have a 600/4 when I need more reach. If I had to pick just one though, it would be the 400 for its versatility and amazing IQ.


+2
I definitely use both, particularly with prep sports where sideline access is often so good that the 400 can be too long. I use the 300 without extender for things like prep baseball and softball (infield), indoor swimming, basketball (far court), golf, some T&F, etc. The 400 or 600 is my lens of choice for field sports like football, lax, soccer, field hockey, but even then I'll sometimes switch off for a change of pace or a different viewpoint. For me, it's critical to have access to both, as I shoot at lots of venues and the access varies widely, even for the same sport.

Aug 24, 2009 at 10:57 PM
dmwierz
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #14 · 400 vs 300


You will only take my 400 out of my cold, dead hands

Aug 25, 2009 at 12:20 AM
DannWunderlich
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · 400 vs 300


dmwierz wrote:
You will only take my 400 out of my cold, dead hands



Im still waiting for you to email one day telling me that youll sell it to me for $1,000

Aug 25, 2009 at 12:54 AM
mikekel
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · 400 vs 300


how close can you get to the field and what are you shooting? If I were shooting D1 it would be the 400 but if it's high school/local where you have free access to the perimeter of the field, 300 is more than enough.

Aug 25, 2009 at 01:48 AM
JON VAN DAAL
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · 400 vs 300


I've had both over the years and currently have the 300/f2.8IS which converts to a 400 with a IdMk3 or a 480 with a 50D. The biggest reason I have the 300 now is the weight as I travel so much - with airlines charging a fortune for excess baggage it is a life saver

Aug 25, 2009 at 12:48 PM
bivey
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · 400 vs 300


As said, it depends on what you are shooting. Remember if you are shooting with a D3 you can switch from full crop to 1.5. When shooting baseball I have switched between the two crop options many times. I hate carrying two cameras and this helps with that. For football I usually carry two cameras with the second having a 80-200 2.8 zoom. Also, I got a 400 2.8 AF-S used lens (from this site). It's about half the price of a new one and is an amazing lens. It also is amazing with the 1.4 TC.

Aug 25, 2009 at 09:48 PM
PierreB
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #19 · 400 vs 300


dmwierz wrote:
You will only take my 400 out of my cold, dead hands


I totally share this viewpoint.

Aug 25, 2009 at 10:08 PM
k1n3t1k
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · 400 vs 300


I once owned the 300/2.8IS and while it's a fantastic lens, I often found it too short for field sports by itself. I used the 1.4xTC on the lens 99% of the time, but this brought me up to f/4 which was fine for most outdoor stuff, but indoors was another story. When you shoot D1 football indoors and have to use 1/500, ISO6400, and f/2.8 you really appreciate a fast, long lens.

Needless to say, I sold my 300 to fund the purchase of my 1Ds-Mark III, but will be picking a 400/2.8IS up next summer. The 300 was great for some indoor sports like basketball and volleyball, but it was a bit tight most of the time and I ended up favoring my 70-200/2.8 and 135/2 for those sports when I needed some reach.

Aug 26, 2009 at 12:47 AM
1
   2   end




FM Forums | Sports Corner | Join Upload & Sell

1
   2   end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost your password?