RustyBug Online Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
One thing to bear in mind when looking at these charts ... you are looking at 20 LPM & 60 LPM.
Compared to other's charts which may include those who use 10 LPM & 30 LPM, even 50 LPM, you are somewhat comparing oranges to tangerines. If you were to see the Oly's results at the lower LPM, they would undoubtedly show better MTF results on paper. This may be why in real world application they have a better reputation than the MTF (60 LPM especially) suggests. 60 LPM ... that is a tough act to pull off. I'd suggest finding other lense that have 60 LPM MTF charts and compare with them.
Not that I'm any expert in the matter, but I don't know of any other MTF charts that are reporting @ 20 LPM & 60 LPM.
The link below has the MTF for the Zeiss 100mm 2.0 Planar ... highly acclaimed.
Zeiss is reporting @ 10 LPM, 20, LPM & 40 LPM. If you look at its 20 LPM, you'll note that it has LOWER MTF scores than some of the Oly's that have been posted.
Another thing to notice is how tightly aligned the Oly's tangential & saggital lines correlate.
http://www.pebbleplacephotography.com/Offload/PDFs/Planar_2_100mm_e.pdf
There are some excellent technical guru's in this Forum, who can better explain than I ... but I think Oly has presented their MTF's with a greater degree of scrutiny than others ... that is why at first glance, the MTF's 'look' worse than Oly's perform.
60 LPM is kind of like 'Pixel Peeping' @ 300% ... doesn't look quite as good compared to something else viewed @ 100% (a bit exagerated, but point is ...)
Another point is that if these lenses have been designed for the smaller 4/3 sensor size, the distance from center should be considered accordingly.
Hope this helps.
|