erichard Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I had the same intent. It's not cheap. I chose a second hand 40 cf, as it is their widest, is sharp, has little distortion, and has the Zeiss look. The earlier versions are not as good optically, and the later IF version, while a smidgeon sharper, has significant distortion and is 3-4 times as expensive (CFE nonIF version is not optically better than the CF version). The CF is plenty sharp. It is however a hefty lens. The Mirex adapter has some limits on the weight of the lens (ie. they don't recommend lenses over 100mm) because the tilt mechanism is held in place only by a friction screw (which is tiny). I turn the mirex upside down to avoid slipping issues if I'm not using the tilt mechanism.
Some are using a Mamiya Mirex adapter and then adding a Hasselblad adapter on top of that. While that may be an adequate solution, it seems like it would add weight, length, and more room for machining error to the whole Frankenstein piece.
Other lenses in the 50-100 mm range are cheaper than the 40 cf. The 100 is reported to be very nice. Realistically speaking, you get more than enough pixels in these panos to worry about the lens differences too much (ie IQ), other than picking your preferred focal length.
I also bought the RRS pano elements package second hand and put it on top of a Markins Q3 (some will say undersized, but it works for my travel purposes).

It's worth it because it has the level built in and you basically can set up the tripod and level the ball head extremely fast (rotates on top of the ball, rather than under the ball). And the rail is indexed, so you can record nodal points for each lens and then set up extremely fast.
Here is a near 360 I took with that setup on a 5DII in New Orleans. When I say fast, this picture took probably <10 minutes including unfolding the tripod, etc. Note the Zeiss look (you can zoom in on the picture on this Gigapan hosting site:
http://gigapan.org/viewGigapanFullscreen.php?auth=8635f9c7fe6638692e9baedbc88afc46
|