dave chilvers Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.1 #18 · Nikon 105 f2.5 AI-S on Eos | |
mawz wrote:
dave chilvers wrote:
mawz wrote:
The 105VR's pretty good, but the other Nikon 105's are better IMHO.
You`re probably right but walking hand held through a wild life park when I had the lens provided some really great wild flower shots hand held, I was impressed.
That's the sort of use the 105VR's at its best for. A close-focusing stabilized lens for general short tele use. The other 105's tend to be better at specialized things (the older 105 Micro's for pure macro work, the f1.8 as a low light/action lens, the f2 and f2.5 for portraiture)
I would want it as a short tele lens for general photography which I gather it will be OK for?
At least it will have a smaller lens hood rather than the trumpet on the front of the Contax 100 3.5
I`ve committed to buy the lens without seeing it so ask:
Does it have( like I`m told by the present owner) a built in hood? and does anyone know the closest focus distance?
Dave
|