Smallest macro lens? - FM Forums

Register · Search · Software · Join Upload & Sell · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda

FM Forums \| Alternative Gear & Lenses \| Join Upload & Sell	Search Used
1 2 3 end

Archive 2009 · Smallest macro lens?

n0b0
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #1 · Smallest macro lens?

I'm not sure why we're discussing this, I clearly said "If you're going to use it for macro...". I'm only discussing the macro application of these lenses and besides, if you really need/want the AF, you wouldn't be in this thread anyway right?

Jul 03, 2009 at 02:39 AM

alexandre
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #2 · Smallest macro lens?

In the 50CM x Zuiko 50/3.5 battle, I'd say it's a draw.
FWIW, I'll buy a 25 ext for my Zuiko.
And, well, if one can't talk about AF here, we should ban threads discussing, say, Conurus-converted lenses... peace!!!

Jul 03, 2009 at 03:03 AM

helimat
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #3 · Smallest macro lens?

Thanks, Alexandre.

Jul 03, 2009 at 03:30 AM

Marcel VanEerd
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #4 · Smallest macro lens?

Industar & a tube to get close. Not sure if it's good enough, but definitely very small and definitely cheap.

Jul 03, 2009 at 03:37 AM

helimat
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #5 · Smallest macro lens?

That wins! 65g... But very ugly!

Jul 03, 2009 at 03:39 AM

mh2000
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #6 · Smallest macro lens?

1:1 with a 50mm lens gives almost no working distance. I think 1:2 is a non-issue for this FL. When a company sells a lifesize converter for their 50-60mm macros they also have a TC to increase FL for 1:1 use... yes I think they know what they are doing, even if Sigma and few others offer 50mm macro lenses that go 1:1... Leica doesn't.

Jul 03, 2009 at 04:43 AM

Anden
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #7 · Smallest macro lens?

mh2000 wrote:
1:1 with a 50mm lens gives almost no working distance. I think 1:2 is a non-issue for this FL. When a company sells a lifesize converter for their 50-60mm macros they also have a TC to increase FL for 1:1 use... yes I think they know what they are doing, even if Sigma and few others offer 50mm macro lenses that go 1:1... Leica doesn't.

I prefer short working distance. That way I can hold on to the flower when shooting insects.

Shot with the Zuiko 38/2.8 on 65-116 tube. Mag. 3.2x.

This image is copyrighted by the owner

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 03, 2009 at 08:29 AM

n0b0
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #8 · Smallest macro lens?

helimat wrote:
My point was that AF sometimes has it's benefits, the EF 50 CM fits the bill as a small 1:2 macro lens AND has AF for other uses.

Despite my seeing a time and a place for AF, I still use alt glass a lot, so I feel I belong in this forum.

I never denied its usefulness. I was merely replying to alexandre that when it comes to buying a lens for Macro, AF is irrelevant and as such shouldn't be a factor in choosing one over the other.

If someone just want to have a normal AF lens that he can sometimes use to dabble in macro then he wouldn't be discussing alternative manual focus macro lens here now would he?

helimat wrote:
And as well I will feel free to discuss anything I wish without first having to check with members from the big penile colony.

You could discuss about Canada being the 51st American state here for all I care, just don't quote my bloody post.

Jul 03, 2009 at 10:39 AM

cogitech
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #9 · Smallest macro lens?

helimat wrote:
My point was that AF sometimes has it's benefits, the EF 50 CM fits the bill as a small 1:2 macro lens AND has AF for other uses.
Despite my seeing a time and a place for AF, I still use alt glass a lot, so I feel I belong in this forum.
And as well I will feel free to discuss anything I wish without first having to check with members from the big penile colony.

At first I was confused by your post, but then I realized that you still haven't clicked the "hide me" button on this contrarian.

Why anyone thinks they can just walk into a room a start mouthing off is beyond me. And then he starts making comments about Canada being the 51st state? We burned down their bloody White House but we're somehow no different than them. Just ask any American if Canada is different. Don't ask a Canuck, we'll go on all day about it.

nObO, I unhid you long enough to see what was going on, and I frankly don't care what your reply might be, but in conclusion, I'll leave you with a quote from the original post:

"Also, please include the Canon 50/2.5 in your comparison if you've used it."

So, we should avoid directly answering the OP's question because it does not suit you?

How well did this approach work with the kids in the playground?

Jul 03, 2009 at 11:55 AM

n0b0
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #10 · Smallest macro lens?

Wtf's with you canucks ey? trying to pick a fight and now gang up on me? Did the fact that he took the first shot at Australia being a penile colony totally escaped you?

I already explained above, I was just replying to alexandre. I also explained that I'm not denying the the usefulness of AF, what more do you want from me ey? If you're not gonna bother reading my explanation, do me a favour and hide me again and stay the hell out of my convo with someone else.

Jul 03, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Marcel VanEerd
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #11 · Smallest macro lens?

n0b0 wrote:
[snip...] [censored acronym] with you canucks ey?.. [/snip]

..that would be "eh"

Jul 03, 2009 at 01:41 PM

siriusdogstar
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #12 · Smallest macro lens?

come on you guys. helimat, the "penile" comment was entirely uncalled-for. nobo, quit fanning the flames by responding in kind. both of you have excellent photographic knowledge to share here, much appreciated by many.

Jul 03, 2009 at 01:44 PM

alexandre
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #13 · Smallest macro lens?

n0b0,

My intention was to compare equipment the OP already has.
I partially disagree with with you regarding AF uselessness w/ macro. You can use it with MF tuning so you don't lose any precious moment. For instance, a bee won't wait for you achieve the desired focus

Anyway, all macro lenses I use are for migh-microcontrast effects and seldom for real macro pics, so you may be 'more right' than me regarding this specific application.

I like to come here everyday and discuss these things in a high level with you fellas. Let's avoid to upset ourselves unnecessarily!

Jul 03, 2009 at 02:35 PM

helimat
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #14 · Smallest macro lens?

siriusdogstar wrote:
come on you guys. helimat, the "penile" comment was entirely uncalled-for. nobo, quit fanning the flames by responding in kind. both of you have excellent photographic knowledge to share here, much appreciated by many.

I just had a different point of view, and was then asked to leave the thread because of it. The arrogance is outstanding, and it comes to light repeatedly from this member, or as Paul accurately described; contrarian. My comment was simply tongue-in-cheek, however it doesn't matter what colony this guy is from, he would be a wanker anywhere I suppose. We have several great contributors from down under, such as Pixel Perfect and Thrice, and I wouldn't want to lump them in the same category. So you are right, I did cross the line, and will apologize for that.

Jul 03, 2009 at 02:41 PM

n0b0
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #15 · Smallest macro lens?

Marcel VanEerd wrote:
n0b0 wrote:
[snip...] [censored acronym] with you canucks ey?.. [/snip]

..that would be "eh"

lol I wasn't trying to mock Canadians with that. In Australia and NZ we do use ey or aye or however you want to spell that.

helimat wrote:
I just had a different point of view, and was then asked to leave the thread because of it.

Ok, looks like it's just a misunderstanding. My apology if you think I asked you to leave, really wasn't my intention.

First of all, when I said "I'm not sure why we're discussing this..." was because I thought we both pretty much agree that for macro AF is not important.

Secondly, my understanding is that "alternative" lenses are manual focus lenses that have to be adapted to the camera body unofficially and as such, I thought that anyone who wants an Auto focus lens wouldn't be here in the first place. My mistake was to use the word "you" and made you think it's personal. Again my apology, I'm not here to make enemies.

Jul 03, 2009 at 03:11 PM

AhamB
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #16 · Smallest macro lens?

helimat wrote:
That being said, I wonder how the nFD 50 CM macro would do? Once converted, if infinity was not a concern, it would even better 1:2 and comes in @ 235g. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...

I use my nFD 50/3.5 very often on a 40D and it handles very nicely with the low weight. Much easier than my heavy Tokina 90/2.5! The maximum focus distance is a limitation though. I am still thinking about trying an Oly 50/3.5 or Micro-Nikkor 50/3.5...

Jul 03, 2009 at 03:34 PM

helimat
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #17 · Smallest macro lens?

nOBO; apology accepted, a misunderstanding it was.

AhamB wrote:
I use my nFD 50/3.5 very often on a 40D and it handles very nicely with the low weight. Much easier than my heavy Tokina 90/2.5! The maximum focus distance is a limitation though. I am still thinking about trying an Oly 50/3.5 or Micro-Nikkor 50/3.5...

Were you just using it with a glassless FD-EF adapter? And what was the maximum distance? Curious if it would be worth adapting or better yet converting.

Jul 03, 2009 at 11:13 PM

AhamB
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #18 · Smallest macro lens?

Yes, (obviously) with glassless/macro adapter, giving some ~10mm of extension.
Max. working distance is reduced to ~15cm (frame area = ~7.5x5cm). The Tokina 90/2.5 gives me ~40cm.

When I hold the 50/3.5 to my 40D without adapter I have about ~40cm (24x16cm area).
Looking at the rear of the lens it looks like it could actually give mirror clearance issues, but I'm no expert at lens conversions. I'd be interested to try it though.

Jul 04, 2009 at 08:55 AM

Toothwalker
Online
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #19 · Smallest macro lens?

Marcel VanEerd wrote:
Industar & a tube to get close. Not sure if it's good enough, but definitely very small and definitely cheap.

A pancake lens on a reversal ring is likely to offer better image quality (in comparison with an extension tube).

Jul 04, 2009 at 09:57 AM

helimat
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #20 · Smallest macro lens?

AhamB wrote:
Yes, (obviously) with glassless/macro adapter, giving some ~10mm of extension.
Max. working distance is reduced to ~15cm (frame area = ~7.5x5cm). The Tokina 90/2.5 gives me ~40cm.

When I hold the 50/3.5 to my 40D without adapter I have about ~40cm (24x16cm area).
Looking at the rear of the lens it looks like it could actually give mirror clearance issues, but I'm no expert at lens conversions. I'd be interested to try it though.

I figured the FD-EF adapter would really reduce the working distance, so that is why I was thinking of conversion. It it were done to maximize working distance although not all the way to infinity, it could work without mirror interference perhaps.

Jul 04, 2009 at 01:43 PM

1 2 3 end
FM Forums \| Alternative Gear & Lenses \| Join Upload & Sell 1 2 3 end