Michael Sessio Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Working way too late.
I hear what you're saying. My counterpoint is there are very valid reasons why people spend the money on more expensive gear. In my example, which was very similar to his example, a 20D probably wouldn't have produced a professional product. At least not what I'd want to present to a client knowing there are far more capable cameras out there.
At any rate, the infamous Ken Rockwell did this schtick some time ago.
$150 vs a $5,000 camera
And then he one-upped himself
$25 vs a $5,000 camera
And Luminous Landscape did a lengthy rebuttal
Your camera does matter
It's an age old debate.
Steady Hand wrote:
Michael,
I like your first photo. 
But, I think Rian's point is that someone who wants to make nicer photos might consider using light rather than thinking they have to have a more expensive body or lens to improve.
You obviously have the gear you need to shoot what YOU like to shoot.
Many others do not have the funds to buy a 5Dmk2 let alone a 5D (or both)...or L glass etc.
You are fortunate to have what you have.
Others like to make photos and have to make do with much less.
So, I think Rian's concept will be interesting to LOTS of folks who want to photograph their friends and local bands and will prove they can make nice photos without having to buy lots of expensive gear that is perhaps outside of THEIR budget or financial ability. 
|