rubberband Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #1 · Pack for _real_ hiking? | |
So I'm fighting with my yearly "need a new bag for something" dilemma. You know how it is.
I'll be on vacation and doing some serious hiking later this summer and need a backpack, as I've finally convinced my significant other than I can bring something better than a P&S along. When I say serious, I mean several hours at a time over difficult terrain - The shoreline to Devil's Chair at Lake Superior National Park, or Mont Albert in Gaspesie National Park are examples of previous trips.
So:
-Needs to be ergonomic enough for a 6-8 hour hike over difficult terrain.
-I'd like to carry a D300 with let's say a Nikon 17-55 mounted
-I'd like to have at most a Sigma 10-20 and Nikon 70-300VR or 18-200VR as well.
-Needs to have a *seperate* compartment for lots (ie 4L or more) of water, first aid, food, jacket, tools and other important non-photo stuff.
Right now my solution is to take a proper hiking daypack, shove the unmounted lenses in the bottom in their padded OEM cases which are in turn in ziplock bags, and carry the body+lens in a toploader bag on a chest harness. This just seems awkward though, and if I bail down a rocky hill I'm going to impale myself on my camera. Ow?
The problem is that the backpacks I've seen in stores from lowepro/tamrac, etc are basically padded bookbags with internal dividers and a useless hipbelt stitched on as an afterthought. Great for around town or shooting on site. Not so great for being worn for several hours over harsh terrain.
The good news is I've got a month until I leave, so I have time to order online if I can find the right thing.
Soo.. any adventurous FMers own somethnig that might work, or have other solutions for taking a minimal setup on a long trek?
|