cdgerston Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #2 · Opinion on 4/3 Cameras with M lenses | |
I haven't used this combination yet myself... but I've been curious as well and I've been reading user reports and reviews at various sites. Here's a few places to look:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/m-43.shtml?main_page=product_info&cPath=2&products_id=205
http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/digital-forum/77719-reidreviews-com-g1.html
http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4559
These sites above actually have several new and old threads going about the G1... use the search functions there.
In addition to these opinions, you could check out Sean Reid's website, reidreviews.com If you're not already familiar with his site, he does great reviews of a variety of stuff, but primarily rangefinder cameras and lenses, and he did a very detailed review of the G1 with m-mount lenses. His is a subscription site so I can't link the article. But his conclusions are that G1 is not a great camera for m-mount lenses, primarily because the sensor and the lenses just don't match each other very well, especially wider lenses. I'm simplifying an otherwise very informative article by a very good reviewer and writer, so if you haven't already got a subscription to reidreviews, and you're interested in rangefinder photography, treat yourself to a subscription. http://www.reidreviews.com/reidreviews/
The reviews overall appear mixed: some are happy with the G1 and RF lenses, some not so much.
At any rate, from the reading I've been doing, I think I'll wait for a while and see where Panasonic and Olympus are going with this technology before making the leap. If one of them makes a camera with a sensor that works well with m-mount lenses, I may just get one.
|