First, thank you all for your comments. It is appreciated.
aF: #2 is in fact a single raw file, no layering, no HDR
Bev: The building in the front of #1 is a Milwaukee landmark . . . the Calatrava, part of the Milwaukee Art Museum. It's probably the most photographed structure in the city.
If you want to see the full rez image, check on my Flickr stream:
rji2goleez wrote:
First, thank you all for your comments. It is appreciated.
aF: #2 is in fact a single raw file, no layering, no HDR
Bev: The building in the front of #1 is a Milwaukee landmark . . . the Calatrava, part of the Milwaukee Art Museum. It's probably the most photographed structure in the city.
If you want to see the full rez image, check on my Flickr stream:
Thanks for sharing that image. I viewed the hi-res version and it looked good. There is a very small amount of noise at 100%, but it is pretty minimal and would likely not really show up in a print. Obviously we don't have a 5D shot in the exact some conditions to compare to, but I think we are going to get more detail out of the 5DII at larger print sizes. I am looking forward to seeing some side by side 5D and 5DII comparisons.
rji2goleez wrote:
Bev: The building in the front of #1 is a Milwaukee landmark . . . the Calatrava, part of the Milwaukee Art Museum. It's probably the most photographed structure in the city.
Bob, I figured it was probably a landmark because it is such an unusual building. Is it supposed to look like a sailboat? That's what it reminds me of. The larger image at Flickr does portray it better. Thanks for the link.
I'm sure there will be lots of comparison. Right now, I'm simply getting used to the camera and honestly, I'm too excited to think about doing some type of detailed study. I can see huge improvements visually over my 5D Mark I just on my screen. To me, that and a print are all the convincing I need.
