Drew_Persson Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #7 · Mamiya 120mm M645 macro vs Tamron 90mm macro | |
I think what appears to be more contrast is actually a bit less exposure than the Tamron, I forgot to change the metering mode with the Tammy to match the no-lens default mode you get with a bellows.
The highlights are blown on both, so they look the same while everything else is more saturated with the Mamiya. Look at the blown-out rim of the penny to the left of "United", you can see detail further up the edge with the Mamiya exposure.
I can't find any MTF or lines per mm info on the 120mm, but I've read that in it's day some said it was the sharpest MF lens ever made. (I expect the newer Hassi HC line and others made for digital backs are better.) Not the best for portraits though, still sharp at distance but hard to focus due to huge focus shift with barely any focus ring movement. For the coins on the monorail rig I set the lens at infinity and focused with the geared movements. Couldn't focus the lens at anything but infinity, since I didn't set the rail to the match the 645 body registration (around 65mm). I'm also concerned that the aperture blades on my used 120mm are out of whack, they don't make a very round pupil when stopped down. It may go back to the seller for replacement, I need to look at some other lenses first to compare.
I'm trying out a few Mamiya RZ lenes for wide angle next. The 140mm RZ macro is nothing special so I went for the 645 instead.
|