Would this bag allow me to carry both my D300 and D700 as well as the 70-200 f/2.8, 24-70 f/2.8, 14-24 f/2.8, and SB900? Preferably with the 24-70 mounted to one body.
I've never owned any Nikon's in my life, you can totally get away with it. Depending on the size, I was able to fit a 17-40 and a 35-75 attached to a body into one compartment and the 70-200 alone on the right side. Check the 70-200's length, and make sure it's not bigger then ~8.3inches, or it won't fit straight down on it's own. I found if you mounted the 70-200 onto the body you can then lay it across, but not straight down.
I found this bag in one of my local camera shops. It's a very well made and thought out bag, but it's too narrow to fit the Nikon 70-200 VR lens as mananetwork has shown with his Canon counterpart. The only way I can see to fit the Nikon 70-200 is to run it vertically down the bag, but it would end up wasting a great deal of space.
When I looked at the website, it shows that this bag comes in medium and small . . . I hope a large comes out in the near future and that it increases the width by 1 or 2 inches. Adding an inch in length wouldn't be bad either.
Chris Noyes wrote:
I found this bag in one of my local camera shops. It's a very well made and thought out bag, but it's too narrow to fit the Nikon 70-200 VR lens as mananetwork has shown with his Canon counterpart. The only way I can see to fit the Nikon 70-200 is to run it vertically down the bag, but it would end up wasting a great deal of space.
When I looked at the website, it shows that this bag comes in medium and small . . . I hope a large comes out in the near future and that it increases the width by 1 or 2 inches. Adding an inch in length wouldn't be bad either....Show more →
