Canon interview on dpreview

FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell	Search Used
1 2 3 end

Archive 2008 · Canon interview on dpreview

brainiac
Offline
Dedicated FM
Account Locked

p.2 #1 · Canon interview on dpreview

Depressing. Either Canon doesn't get what is wrong with its line-up, or it just doesn't care.

Oct 03, 2008 at 02:18 PM

simonella_viru
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #2 · Canon interview on dpreview

Oct 03, 2008 at 02:22 PM

Tim Speciale
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #3 · Canon interview on dpreview

bluetsunami wrote:
The comment about the AF is hilarious. I would rather have a bulky box of a body if it meant the AF being the same as the 1Ds Mark III, too.

First it was because there were no complaints about the AF in the 5D and now its this. Heh.

Umm, yeah..they make that camera. It's called the 1Ds Mark III

Oct 03, 2008 at 02:27 PM

SoundHound
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #4 · Canon interview on dpreview

You don't really expect an executive to admit that they are crippling their 5D series to protect their flagship pro cameras do you? It's obvious Canon has even better FF sensor technology (50D type gapless pixels) and processors (2/4 Digic IVs) ready for their Mk IVs.

But they are going to wait for Nikon (and others) to take their, next, best shot. They want to sell as many of their Mk IIIs as they can before obsoleting them with a new series that will most certainly devastate (FF 30+ Mp, 6400 ISO and maybe cinema level video) the competition

Oct 03, 2008 at 02:28 PM

Tim Speciale
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #5 · Canon interview on dpreview

SoundHound wrote:
You don't really expect an executive to admit that they are crippling their 5D series to protect their flagship pro cameras do you? It's obvious Canon has even better FF sensor technology (50D type gapless pixels) and processors (2/4 Digic IVs) ready for their Mk IVs.

But they are going to wait for Nikon (and others) to take their, next, best shot. They want to sell as many of their Mk IIIs as they can before obsoleting them with a new series that will most certainly devastate (FF 30+ Mp, 6400 ISO and maybe cinema level video) the competition

Oh good lord. Are we seriously about to embark on new speculation?

Oct 03, 2008 at 02:37 PM

loudtiger
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #6 · Canon interview on dpreview

5D Mk 3 will have 10 point AF. I heard it from my cousin who knows someone at this local store whose mom's ex-husband is a canon rep

better get ready... 3/2009

Oct 03, 2008 at 02:40 PM

Steve Spencer
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #7 · Canon interview on dpreview

Beni wrote:
There have been no complaints from users? No one listening to the people saying that there is a single useable AF point, albeit a good one?

Not sure I follow his logic either. If there is a bigger AF sensor in a smaller body (50D) then to put it in a larger body would mean making the larger body bigger?

It's BS anyway, the AF sensor is exactly the same size which is why the points are nearer the edges on the crop camera.

I think you are missing the point here and although the answer definitely smells of BS, it has a kernel of truth as well. If you compare the 20D/30D to the 40D/50D, they did increase the size of the camera a little bit. It seems likely to me that as they increased the size of the camera they also made a bit more room for a larger AF sensor. Since the size of the AF sensor in the 5D and presumably the 5D MKII is the the same as the 20D/30D, then it seems likely that the AF sensor may actually be bigger in the 40D/50D than in the 5D/5DMKII. If you cut through the BS, however, what is really being said here is that Canon was not willing to redesign the body to allow for an improved AF system. Such a redesign would have increased the size a little, but it is probably BS that the size increase is why they didn't do it. The size increase would probably have been pretty small. The real reason they didn't do is probably because they thought that the cost of redesigning the body and improving the AF wouldn't translate into enough increased sales to justify it. It seem likely they made this design because their market research suggested that most 5D users were pretty happy with the AF on their cameras.

So yes the answer is BS, but it contains just enough truth to let them get away with saying it and to prevent them from having to fess up to being too cheap to improve the AF system. My two cents.

Oct 03, 2008 at 03:08 PM

Etadam
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #8 · Canon interview on dpreview

This interview confirms the feeling I got when trying the 5D2 (topic), a 5D stuffed with more pixels and a manually (or almost) focused video.
After trying the Nikon D700, the 5D2 looks already like an old hat.

Oct 03, 2008 at 03:24 PM

brainiac
Offline
Dedicated FM
Account Locked

p.2 #9 · Canon interview on dpreview

Etadam wrote:
After trying the Nikon D700, the 5D2 looks already like an old hat.

except for the wonderful 1Ds3 sensor in a $2700 box.

Oct 03, 2008 at 03:41 PM

monochrome
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #10 · Canon interview on dpreview

If you can't get the image to it, it makes the sensor mute.

Oct 03, 2008 at 03:42 PM

Tim Speciale
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #11 · Canon interview on dpreview

monochrome wrote:
If you can't get the image to it, it makes the sensor mute.

Are you f'ing kidding me? I'm so sick of this forum and the hacks that patrol it. If you can't get an image on a 5D you are a hack. Nothing more. Perhaps something less. Go find a new freaking hobby for christ sake.

Oct 03, 2008 at 04:03 PM

Vivek
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #12 · Canon interview on dpreview

brainiac wrote:
Depressing. Either Canon doesn't get what is wrong with its line-up, or it just doesn't care.

I think the second is true...and their market share is not taking a hit AFAICT. Basically, they just ignore folks like us on the forums when majority of the folks who buy these cameras don't really have strong opinions about the features we are clamoring about (or else their market share would tell them a different story).

Having said that, I am still craving a smaller body with 1D class AF performance and I WILL pay the price. Heck, I would even pay 4K+ for a removable grip 1D Mk IV.

-V

Oct 03, 2008 at 04:24 PM

monochrome
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #13 · Canon interview on dpreview

If you can't take a joke, you go somewhere, I have a few suggestions where to go or what to do with your suggestion, but FM might get mad it I post those words.

Tim Speciale wrote:

Are you f'ing kidding me? I'm so sick of this forum and the hacks that patrol it. If you can't get an image on a 5D you are a hack. Nothing more. Perhaps something less. Go find a new freaking hobby for christ sake.

Oct 03, 2008 at 04:25 PM

Tim Speciale
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #14 · Canon interview on dpreview

monochrome wrote:
If you can't take a joke, you go somewhere, I have a few suggestions where to go or what to do with your suggestion, but FM might get mad it I post those words.

Tim Speciale wrote:

Are you f'ing kidding me? I'm so sick of this forum and the hacks that patrol it. If you can't get an image on a 5D you are a hack. Nothing more. Perhaps something less. Go find a new freaking hobby for christ sake.

If you were joking then you wouldn't have taken offense to what i've said. This forum has seeped to the level of DPreview (so far so that they must post the garbage that is posted over there).

We are suppose to be photographers, not gear nerds. The two aren't mutually exclusive but when you start insinuating that the 5D or 5DMKII or any other modern SLR can't take a photograph you look like a buffoon, at least in the eyes of those who take photography, at least, semi-seriously.

Oct 03, 2008 at 04:36 PM

deebo7
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #15 · Canon interview on dpreview

i still cant imagine how people just waste their time here talking about idle drivel. Tim, your right. Everyone else, go through old photos and see the caliber of pictures photographers have been able to shoot with film and non AF lenses. Then sit down and be quiet.

Oct 03, 2008 at 04:44 PM

tonyabbott
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #16 · Canon interview on dpreview

Yes, I too was amazed at what was said:
"The EOS 1Ds Mark III, by comparison, offers robust durability and long shutter life as the most important features for use in harsh studio conditions, we believe. However when it comes to image quality itself; because of the constant digital technology developments in this industry, it's always the latest camera that is best. So things like ISO expansion range and dynamic range are in a sense better in the 5D Mark II."
Apart from the quite considerable price difference, "long shutter life" does not really cut it for me, as I had to replace the shutter in my 1DsMkII after 18 months.

Oct 03, 2008 at 05:05 PM

michael49
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #17 · Canon interview on dpreview

Tim Speciale wrote:
monochrome wrote:
If you can't get the image to it, it makes the sensor mute.

Are you f'ing kidding me? I'm so sick of this forum and the hacks that patrol it. If you can't get an image on a 5D you are a hack. Nothing more. Perhaps something less. Go find a new freaking hobby for christ sake.

I often use my 40D over my 5D when I really need to get the shot; I trust my 40's AF more than my 5D's, which is understandable, the 40D is newer technology, but to not improve the 5D II's AF is just amazing to me.

Oct 03, 2008 at 05:14 PM

monochrome
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #18 · Canon interview on dpreview

Tim Speciale wrote:
monochrome wrote:
If you can't take a joke, you go somewhere, I have a few suggestions where to go or what to do with your suggestion, but FM might get mad it I post those words.

Tim Speciale wrote:

Are you f'ing kidding me? I'm so sick of this forum and the hacks that patrol it. If you can't get an image on a 5D you are a hack. Nothing more. Perhaps something less. Go find a new freaking hobby for christ sake.

If you were joking then you wouldn't have taken offense to what i've said. This forum has seeped to the level of DPreview (so far so that they must post the garbage that is posted over there).

We are suppose to be photographers, not gear nerds. The two aren't mutually exclusive but when you start insinuating that the 5D or 5DMKII or any other modern SLR can't take a photograph you look like a buffoon, at least in the eyes of those who take photography, at least, semi-seriously.

There are many that feel that the 5D has many problems shooting in low light, for Canon to want to give me a new 5D with the same AF as the old, I have to become a bit of a gearhead to follow that logic.

There's no insinuation about it, the 5D has problems shooting in lowlight. I have shot many times with it this year and that has been the crippler for me. Waiting for a new 5D, for a better system and they put VIDEO in it instead of a better AF. Don't talk about gearheads, Canon has changed that.

I agree with you about the direction of FM. But if FM won't control it, who cares. You want to insult someone, think again before you do.

Oct 03, 2008 at 05:44 PM

Scott T
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #19 · Canon interview on dpreview

That guy must have taken notes from Alan Greenspan. His vague responses could be interpreted different ways. My take is this more of the same ol' same ol' from Canon.

They are obviously a skilled technology company, but they are certainly tone deaf to the market and their users. If I'm not young or a female why do I want an APS-C camera? (according to Canon) oh yeah, I don't...but they don't have a FF sports camera.

Their product line up doesn't make a lot of sense to me right now, they have the professional marketwell defined and a product for each segment. But once you get below that - I don't think they have answer for some key market segments, nor do they seem to have a plan to address them.

Oct 03, 2008 at 06:18 PM

Scott T
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #20 · Canon interview on dpreview

deebo7 wrote:
i still cant imagine how people just waste their time here talking about idle drivel. Tim, your right. Everyone else, go through old photos and see the caliber of pictures photographers have been able to shoot with film and non AF lenses. Then sit down and be quiet.

If you think FM is turning in to dpr, as you say in your own thread here then do something about it, and either raise your game and make informative posts, or move on. This kind of posts is insulting to those of us that read the interview and would like to talk about it, and more so to those that have shot film for many years before we migrated to digital.

Oct 03, 2008 at 06:31 PM

1 2 3 end
FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell 1 2 3 end