Canon L zooms and 21mp

FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell	Search Used
1 2 3 end

Archive 2008 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

khurram1
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #1 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

This is a question for 1DsIII owners on how good Canon's L zoom are with the 21mp sensor.

I've owned and been happy with most of the various L zooms I've owned over the years (80-200L, 70-200L 2.8, 70-200L 2.8L IS, 28-70L, 24-70L, 24-105L, 17-35L, 16-35L, 16-35L II).

However, the only L zooms i've used since going digital are the 24-105L, 16-35L, 16-35L II and the 70-200L IS. How good are these with the 21mp sensor

After coming pretty close to going Nikon at the start of this year after frustration with my 1DIII, i decided to stick it out with Canon and despite saying i won't be a beta tester for canon again, I've pre-ordered the 5D II. I'm also planning on picking up the Ziess 21mm landens when it is available next year and possibly may also pick up the 85L after eying it for since the mid 90's.

However, I'm not sure if my current lenses are going to be sharp enough with the new 21mp sensor, as I've read various opinions from 1DsII and 1DsIII users on the need to stick with the Canon's L primes or lieca/zeiss wide angle primes to use with the 1DsII and 1DsIII.

Anyway, any advice from those that are using Canon's L zooms with the 1DsIII would be apprecaited.

Sep 23, 2008 at 11:29 PM

jmvdigital
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #2 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

I can't give you any definitive answer, but if it helps, I sold my 24-70 and my 70-200 IS after moving to the 1DsIII. They weren't cutting it for me. I picked up a 35L and a 135L instead for now. Haven't shot with them yet though. There was a recent thread about the 24-105 being soft, I posted a few samples of that lens on my 1DsIII as well. It's definitely soft, to me, but it's not my lens. YMMV.

Sep 24, 2008 at 01:24 AM

Jammy Straub
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #3 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

From what I've heard as represented by the amazing smiley faces:

24-70

24-105

70-200 2.8 IS

70-200 2.8

70-200 4 IS

70-200 4

16-35 II

100-400

Sep 24, 2008 at 01:31 AM

khurram1
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #4 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

Doesn't sound to encouraging for me

Sep 24, 2008 at 02:54 AM

Stunnaz
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #5 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

Jammy Straub wrote:
From what I've heard as represented by the amazing smiley faces:

24-70

24-105

70-200 2.8 IS

70-200 2.8

70-200 4 IS

70-200 4

16-35 II

100-400

haha... that's actually a pretty accurate representation. Good job!

Sep 24, 2008 at 02:58 AM

scalesusa
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #6 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

You might not get a big gain when shooting wide open with these lenses, but stopped down, the image should be sharper when viewed at the same size as the lower MP cameras.

If you view at full 21mp resolution, you will start seeing the limitations of the lens, but expect the final image at 8 X 10 to be sharper.

Sep 24, 2008 at 03:10 AM

kenshin
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #7 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

Yikes, that's not a good sign since what're the chances of Canon updating all those

lenses in the near future? Seems like the entire zoom range from 16-200 f/2.8 needs to be replaced.

Sep 24, 2008 at 03:11 AM

jagsiva
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #8 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

i got rid of my 17-40, 24-105 and 70-200 2.8 IS.

Current lineup is 14II, 35, 50, 85, 135, 200/2, 300 and 600 and they are all fantastic...but...I spent hours with micro adjust and had all these lenses absolutely tack sharp, but this seems to somewhat "go off" now and then. Maybe just me...

take a look at www.the-digital-picture.com, there are some nice samples of charts (mostly with a 1dsIII) and you can compare various lenses at different apertures.

Sep 24, 2008 at 03:16 AM

Lars Johnsson
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #9 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

My zoom lenses works good on my 1Ds3.
16-35 II
24-70
70-200/2,8 IS
I have of course a lot of prime lenses also.

Sep 24, 2008 at 04:31 AM

Lars Johnsson
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #10 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

Jammy Straub wrote:
From what I've heard as represented by the amazing smiley faces:

24-70

24-105

70-200 2.8 IS

70-200 2.8

70-200 4 IS

70-200 4

16-35 II

100-400

But how many of those have you actually used on the 1Ds3

Or have you only been reading this in the forums from other people that have heard it in other places

Sep 24, 2008 at 04:35 AM

Studio58
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #11 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

what a crock.... you guys are kidding yourselves.

Sep 24, 2008 at 05:30 AM

Daan B
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #12 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

I use both the 24-70L and 70-200 f/4 IS on my 1Ds3. While I really liked the 24-70L on my 5D, IMO it falls short on my 1Ds3. Mainly wide open, at the corners and at the long end of the zoom range... but only when I view 100% on my monitor or print (very) large. The 70-200 f/4 IS is fine on my 1Ds3.

Oh, and I have tested two 24-105L's that I borrowed from friends. As far as resolution goes, they show roughly the same characteristics as my 24-70L on the 1Ds3.

Sep 24, 2008 at 07:31 AM

Justin D
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #13 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

I haven't used a 1DsIII or, of course, a 5DII (though I ordered one from the US today). However, they have similar pixel density to the 30D, which I used extensively with a 24-105 and 70-200 f4 IS. Both were fantastic on the 30D. Of course, we aren't seeing the corners of the lenses as such on a 30D. The corners weren't as good as good primes even on a 5D, so I expect they'll be a bit meh on a 1DsIII/5DII, but I expect the centre to be sharp.
The biggest problems with my remaining L prime - the 24-105 - are vignetting and distortion (only really visible on FF bodies), which tend to just make me not like the images taken with it straight away when I look at them, and that causes me to use it less, despite the fact that they are still very workable with 5 seconds of correction. I'm going to consciously try to love my 24-105 again with my 5DII, by cropping it back and by correcting for distortion and vignetting before I make judgements (if I can).

Sep 24, 2008 at 07:47 AM

jcbenner
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #14 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

Jammy Straub wrote:
From what I've heard as represented by the amazing smiley faces:

24-70

24-105

70-200 2.8 IS

70-200 2.8

70-200 4 IS

70-200 4

16-35 II

100-400

In my experience, the 16-35 II holds up well on the 1Ds3.

Sep 24, 2008 at 11:08 AM

Matt B.
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #15 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

Would Canon really design a camera that would outmatch their available lenses that they know most users will be using?

Sep 24, 2008 at 11:24 AM

Marcus Watts
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #16 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

Your non L lenses will be fine on a 21 megapixel sensor so there won't be any problem.

Sep 24, 2008 at 11:53 AM

xrayvision
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #17 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

As usual the answer to your question is;

It all depends.........

If you are posting uncropped downsampled pics on the web all lenses are just fine on the 21mp sensor. So is a $400 pocket camera.
If you are printing high quality 20 x 30 inch sizes the zoom lenses are a total toss-up. One 70-200 will look ok at f/6.3 another one will look bad printed that size.
And then again;
I've seen pics people thought were absolutely gorgeous. I look at them and think that I would delete it immediately if I found it on my computer

Sep 24, 2008 at 12:22 PM

moondigger
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #18 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

Almost all lenses will produce better photos (from a technical standpoint) on a 21 MP sensor than on a 12 MP sensor of the same physical dimensions.

Is the 21 MP sensor more likely to show the lens's flaws when viewing at 100%? Yes, absolutely. But that's irrelevant to the final output, which will be a fixed size print or web image at much less than 100% magnification.

That aside, while the 21 MP full-frame sensor is the 'toughest' one for lenses to 'live up to' in the corners at 100%, it's not the toughest sensor overall. That would be the 50D's 15 MP sensor, which has the smallest pixels in the lineup, considerably denser than those in a full-frame 21 MP sensor. And yet it's not like image quality will drop when you use a consumer zoom on the 50D compared with using the same zoom on a 40D or 30D. Image detail will still increase slightly, as improvements in resolution are beneficial to final image quality whether those improvements come with the capture device (sensor) or the imaging device (lens). Again, don't draw conclusions just by viewing things at 100%.

Sep 24, 2008 at 12:32 PM

ward1066
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #19 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

I have good luck with the 24-105, I use it as my primary walk around lens. Here is a 100% crop from a sraw file shot in standard, no other sharpening.

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Sep 24, 2008 at 12:46 PM

Daan B
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #20 · Canon L zooms and 21mp

ward1066 wrote:
I have good luck with the 24-105, I use it as my primary walk around lens. Here is a 100% crop from a sraw file shot in standard, no other sharpening.

Looks good for a 5MP sRAW file

How about a 100% crop from a 100% RAW file?

Sep 24, 2008 at 12:54 PM

1 2 3 end
FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell 1 2 3 end