Michael H Offline Buy and Sell: On
|
jerryrock wrote:
jchin wrote:I do love a Mac (mainly because I love to run Unix, which I do), but for the sack of having one laptop to support my day job, I will keep it Windows (purely, no VMWARE, no VirtualBox, no VirtualPC, etc. etc.). It just doesn't look professional to support clients in Windows environments with a Mac (or Linux, or BSD) running an emulator. Besides, not everything runs in an emulator.
Thanks.
JChin,
Please read my previous post. The new intel based Mac does not need emulation software to run Windows. It runs Windows natively and faster than any other laptop on the market.
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2007/10/30/fastest-vista-notebook-mac
Jerry
I'm always VERY reluctant to jump into these fan-boy discussions that popup at the most inappropriate discussions, but...
Jerry, the first thing I'd tell you is you really don't add much credibility to your position using a nearly 1-year old report from theinquirier. Just like there are other ah hem..."stories" like this one linked supporting the position, there are just as many supporting the opposite. There are pro/con arguements for both sides of the fence. However, when someone asks about an "inexpensive solution" (quoted from the OP) a Macbook Pro is the last thing a reasonable person would ever consider. Expensive to purchase, more expensive to upgrade, more expensive for common parts, less reliable, blah, blah...
I think this quote from the article you referenced sums it all up for me...
Errrrr.....
....except that a notebook full of standard x86 bits and running Windows isn't a Mac anymore, it's a PC. Jolly well done to Apple for manufacturing an IBM clone 25 years after everyone else did it!
---
Get off the stupic mac/pc pissing contests and objectively answer the questions.
|