FWIW AFAIK the only real advantages of the most expensive models are speed of scanning (both in complete scan time and in the ability to batch scan). I wish I could justify a nice scanner like one of those...
ricardovaste wrote:
FWIW AFAIK the only real advantages of the most expensive models are speed of scanning (both in complete scan time and in the ability to batch scan). I wish I could justify a nice scanner like one of those...
I believe the v700 does allow wet-mounting, which is theoretically capable of better results, but would be too much hassle for me. I'd recommend the v500.
pawlowski6132 wrote:
I assumed hr meant , was the negative scanned , or was it wet printed and then the print photographed.
thanks for the reply, and time! I am such a noob at this, and so used to digital, that film is so much advanced than I thought, but of course it is the granddaddy! I am really curious, and digging the film, and medium format scene!
Thank you. No, not a Polaroid. Fujifilm Neopan Acros film was what I used to make this image.
What made you think Polaroid?
i am so unaware, so i jumped to conclusion based on the size, and i think that Polaroids are smaller than full sized, and i forgot to think crop, or anything else! thanks for the response, and correspondence!
carstenw wrote:
Quadruple post!
sorry for the over enthusiasm! please understand, i am very excited, and i am almost ready to junp the film boat! i am close to getting a Rollei system, and it has everything i need, and more! well, ok i need to sleep now, its 3:40 AM here in California USA, and I need to be up at 7 AM
please understand, i am very excited, and i am almost ready to junp the film boat! i am close to getting a Rollei system, and it has everything i need, and more! well, ok i need to sleep now, its 3:40 AM here in California USA, and I need to be up at 7 AM 