xealot Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Not only this. Full frame sensors receive more light for any aperture. So, given a sensor technology, it is easier to get high IQ especially in high ISO for full frame.
linathael wrote:
David Baldwin wrote:
Hello linathael
I agree that DX is great for telephoto lenses, absolutely. However if you are a wideangle photographer then DX really, really sucks. For example, my beautiful Nikkor 28mm becomes a 42mm equivalent, and my 24mm becomes (on my Canon) a 38mm. Not wide at all.
Yes, I know that you can buy specialist DX wides, but they are all slow. Even the superduper new Tokina 11-16 is "only" 2.8, I personally could have taken DX more seriously if either Canon or Nikon had ever released a fast wide, for example a 19mm f1.4
The fact that such lenses never appears tells me that Nikon and Canon were never that committed to DX, in the long term.
Hello David, thanks for the comment, I better understand now, and I agree to have already experienced similar frustration already with my 18-70mm, not wide enough indeed... but as I more a wild and normal life shooter, I might be less affected than others.
I wanted to bring the point about pixel numbering, as a 12 MP FF will bing less definition than a 12 MP DX, so indeed if you want it wide you want it FX, but if you want it zoomed and.or detailed you want it DX.
Let see what nikon can grab from ts black hat, all things I know is that there is a special discount campaign on Canon 40D and other bodies and lenses ending on June 30th... 
|