cinnabull Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
J,
I realise video is recorded in a lower resolution, however its the technology I was getting at to make larger ratio zooms. I believe this technology is available, I mean, if there was an adapter available to put my broadcast video lens on a still camera, I would bet the results would be equal to, if not better than the equivalent still lens. I get top quality video at a much lower resolution than what a still camera is capable of, now if I could put the resolving power of my lens on a still camera, I bet the results would be spectacular. I may be wrong, but that is what I think would be the outcome. I must stress here, there is quite a noticable visual difference in the pictures produced on a broadcast spec and professional spec video lens. Far more than in the comparison done by Mark.
I have read with interest your previous posts, advising quality glass is paramount in producing the best results. Based on my experience with video, I would subscribe to that theory, however looking at the results on this thread has put a bit of doubt in my mind when considering still lenses. Maybe the difference is greater in video lenses than still, who knows.
M,
Cant wait for your further tests!!. Keep up the good work.
stuart
Edited by cinnabull on Jan 11, 2004 at 11:27 AM GMT
Edited by cinnabull on Jan 11, 2004 at 11:52 AM GMT
|