tubescreamerx Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.1 #19 · Which lenses for backpacking Europe? | |
cogitech wrote:
BTW, put some black electrical tape over the white lettering on the camera and get a generic (preferably old-looking) camera strap. A third-party zoom on an "unknown" camera is much less likely to draw attention. I taped up my 5D and I stick old manual focus glass on the front and use an old Contax strap. Many people probably assume I'm shooting film.
All my current gear already has black tape over all the labels/model names and I shoot with a non-conventional Black Rapid strap anyway. I don't like when people see what I'm shooting with and then make comments based on that. This is a boon for thwarting thieves too.
twistedlim wrote:
I like your flickr site. Very nice. I am off to Italy in a few weeks and am taking (after much debate) 10-22, 17-50, and 85 1.8. 85 for creative DOF stuff as well as low light and the other 2 are pretty obvious. I am leaving a 24-105, 35 2.0, 50 1.8 and some other long lenses at home. I took the 50 and 35 last trips and hardly ever used them.
Thanks. That's what I'm afraid of--no need to carry gear if I'm only going to use it 5 or even 10% of the time.
kevinsullivan wrote:
If I were you I'd start by experimenting at home: load up your backpack with combinations and you'll soon figure out what you're comfortable carrying all day. If it were me I can tell you I'd minimize bulk and weight. The body+Tamron is already a lot. I don't think the 30 or 85 add much. The 85's not so much longer that it makes a huge difference. If you had a 70-300 IS that migth be a different story. I'd leave the two primes at home and maybe carry a small tripod/ballhead/clamp instead. If I were you I'd also consider selling the 30 and 85 and buying a 10-22 or similar ultrawide, or a 70-300 IS, to really extend your range.
My backpack will be left in the hostels at all times, except when walking to/from the train stations and airports. The only thing I'll be carrying all day, every day is the Domke J-803. I don't think the 30 or 85 add much either, but I think the 85 adds more than the 30 would in this situation. Museum photos (no flash; low-light) are not a concern for me, since I personally don't think they're that interesting...
I wish I had an ultra-wide! No time for that now though, leaving in less than 36 hours.
mh2000 wrote:
I spent a year "backpacking" Europe... and left my SLR gear at home and only took an Olympus XA with the tiny flash (usually left in the hotel/hostel/pension) and I got the good photos I needed. Unless the purpose for your trip is photography and nothing else I would find a small camera that takes good photos.
Photography isn't my sole purpose for the trip, but it's definitely the perfect opportunity to really get creative and capture things I won't see again (or at least for many, many years).
Thanks for all the suggestions and experience... I'm leaning toward the 17-50 and 30 combo for the first group of countries (Amsterdam through Budapest) and then replacing the 30 with the 85 for Morocco + Spain. I have a stopover in London for a day in between those groups, so I'll be swinging by my dorm for laundry/gear swapping.
Edited on Mar 15, 2008 at 01:53 PM
|